It's absolutely fine to want world-class services like the Swedes enjoy, but the corollary must be that we should be prepared to pay for them just as much as the Swedes do.
Can't have one without the other.
amp.theguardian.com/money/2008/nov…
So to look to Scandinavia or Austria or other high-tax jurisdictions as examples of what the state can do, without looking at the tax implications, is only half the story!
If they get angry, it means they don't have a real answer.
999 times out of a thousand, you won't get to have one because you'll be accused of trying to do down or sabotage reforms.
Your only sin? Asking reasonably and logically how they will be paid for...
That's the level of the difference between them and us.