Thread by @umar8528

Pak constitution can be criticized its not a holy book but PTM can't.

Reasons:
1/ PTM presented their struggle as a movement that is struggling for their *constitutional* rights.

2/ But in Bannu Jalsa they made a somersault & said Pak constitution is protecting Punjabis

(cont)

..and Constitution has made us slaves (of Punjabis)

No logical arguments or proofs presented that how Constitution is biased towards Pashtuns of *PTM*

Is this a criticism or racism?

Is it not an attempt to spreading anarchy and encourage citizens to stand up against the state?

Also, this has to be seen & judged that this so-called *criticism* of the constitution, where it's coming from?

PTM leader Ali Wazir called Pak Parliament "Dalaal" (Pimp).

His nephew in the student solidarity march called for dragging parliamentarian on Mall road.

And now Manzoor Pashteen is saying Pak constitution is serving Punjabis and made Pashtuns their subservient.

In their Jalsas & private gatherings, they pass racist slurs to non-Pashtuns, threaten to kill Army soldiers.

They dont want to teach their kids about Jinnah and Quaid.

In their Jalsas, they dont allow Pakistan flags, their leaders have been seen with the Pashtunistan flag.

PTM was against ex-FATA merger with KP, they are against Durrand line fencing and now they have a problem with the Pak constitution.

Even if you make Manzoor Pashteen PM of Pak and give portfolios to PTM members they will not be satisfied.

This ethno nazi movement of Waziristan will not settle anything less than Pashtunistan.