1/ On the day Israeli civilians endure a barrage of rockets aimed at its cities and towns, Bernie goes full anti-AIPAC.
And that's not the only reason the timing raises eyebrows. Only a half year ago, he spoke at the ISNA convention.
And that's not the only reason the timing raises eyebrows. Only a half year ago, he spoke at the ISNA convention.
2/ So if the test is bigotry and opposition of basic rights -- one presumes by the latter Bernie means a right to a state of Palestine -- does nobody at ISNA conventions express bigotry or Israeli rights?
Unfortunately that's not the case:
Unfortunately that's not the case:
3/ ISNA's 2019 convention is full of people who reject Israel's right to exist. I'd venture to guess without counterpoint theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/…. (At AIPAC, at least, there are many who support a two-state solution.)
4/ We already know Amer Zahr, who says Israel is ISIS and shouldn't exist. And Sarsour, who think supporting Israel's existence is the creepiest, and who wants to remove the vaginas from victims of genital mutilation whose politics she disagrees with.
5/ Zahra Billoo, who here supports the an antisemitic terror group's war crimes. (see also adl.org/news/press-rel…) Suhaib Webb, who speaks of "The Jews" wanting to kill Jesus and as being the "greatest antagonizers" of Muhammed.
6/ If we look back earlier, there's the guy who said Jews control the world and brought the Holocaust upon themselves through their disobedience. forward.com/news/109594/an… ISNA officials condemned the remarks. But... this is copacetic and AIPAC is not? Please.
