But a new study shows that, on average, nonvoters are actually less progressive than voters.
Me @TheAtlantic.
[Thread]
theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/…
As AOC recently said, "The swing voters that we’re most concerned with are the nonvoters to voters.”
So let's test it.
As a group, nonvoters really are a little less white than voters. But the difference is way smaller than many assume.
Taken together, blacks and Latinos make up 21% of voters and 28% of nonvoters.
➼ Two out of every three nonvoters are white.
Nonvoters are way, way less progressive than is commonly believed.
While they are somewhat more liberal on economic policy, where they favor things like a higher minimum wage at somewhat stronger levels, they are markedly more conservative on key cultural issues.
Given that nonvoters are, on key cultural issues, more conservative than voters, it shouldn't come as a surprise that they are also less likely to identify as liberal, to call themselves Democrats, or to think it is urgent to remove Trump from the White House.
By contrast, 30% consider themselves moderate and 28% conservative.
A certain kind of centrist projects all his hopes on nonvoters. What they (supposedly) want is "fiscally responsible" economic policies and moderately progressive social policies. That's a self-serving myth.
But the idea of the progressive nonvoter is just as wrong.
My two cents:
Any candidate for office, moderate or progressive, is unlikely to win if he stakes his strategy on an imaginary electorate.
The idea of mobilizing one group without mobilizing the other is, as Ruy Teixeira told me, "magical pixie dust." And in 2020, the price of believing in magic may turn out to be very high.
And please read the excellent study by the @knightfdn
for yourself!
theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/…
knightfoundation.org/wp-content/upl…
[End.]