It's a story of persistent high global #CO2 emissions, but with some hints (and some hope!) that *total* human #emissions are levelling off.
(Although with considerable uncertainty in the land use change emissions).
But did anyone mention that we need to get that red line π to hit zero to meet the commitments made in #Paris?
π
The pandemic led to a sharp decline in #fossil CO2 #emissions, but an almost equally sharp rebound in 2021 and a further 1% rise in 2022. Hence 2022 is a new *record year* for fossil CO2 emissions.
... Not the first time that global events have all-too-briefly pierced the trend.
There are nuggets of good news on national scales. In 2022, #fossil CO2 #emissions reduced in #China and the #EU.
... but those reductions were counteracted by increased emissions from #India, the #US and elsewhere.
Globally, #emissions from #coal and #oil grew in 2021 and 2022, whereas emissions from #gas fell slightly after their 2021 rebound.
Lurking behind those global numbers are some pretty spectacular increases in #emissions from #coal in #India (+5% from '21 to '22) and the #EU (+6.7%).
In the #EU, reduced #gas (-10%) emissions were countered by growth in #coal emissions (+6.7%) between '21 & '22.
No prizes for guessing why ... πΊπ¦
A related increase in emissions per unit energy added to the increased emissions caused by the post-pandemic economic rebound.
The latest changes in fossil CO2 #emissions are superimposed on vastly different baseline rates of emissions and inequitable emissions per capita across countries.
e.g. #US per capita emissions are falling, yet still 3x the global mean, and >2x the mean in the #EU.
Some good news. (Maybe.)
There are promising signs of a decline in global #land use change #emissions.
Although these estimates come with the highest uncertainty of any component of the global carbon budget.
National #emissions estimates for #land use change are an exciting new feature of this year's budget.
#Indonesia and #Brazil have contributed ~45% of the global emissions (past decade).
Land use change emissions declined steadily in Brazil since ~2005.
The plots above all show *net* land use change #emissions; the balance of emissions from #deforestation and landscape degradation, and sinks via re/afforestation and wood harvest.
Over the past decade, the sinks counterbalanced ~half of deforestation/degradation emissions.
#Land use change #emissions have contributed ~10% of the total #CO2 emissions in recent years.
However, land use change continues to be a historically significant source of CO2 to the atmosphere (~30% of the total).
What is the fate of all this #CO2 that we've chucked into the atmosphere?
A quirk of our planet's system, which we should all be thankful for, is that only ~half of human emissions remain in the atmosphere (so far).
The #land and #oceans dampen our impact on atmospheric #CO2 by ~53%
Over the past decade, land took up ~29% of human emissions, and the oceans ~26%.
The land #sink (to land which has escaped use by humans) continues to rise in response #CO2 fertilisation (CO2 being plant food, and all).
Removals through enhanced vegetation growth outweigh #emissions from land use change.
Worth noting, however, that the effect of #climate change, caused by historical emissions, has been to suppress the lank sink (the "red zones" π).
Some places are neutral, or net sources - due to the pressures that #climate change brings (e.g. drought, fire...)
The #ocean sinks have also grown as the #CO2 concentration gradient between the #atmosphere and ocean waters has sharpened.
The absorption of emitted #CO2 by the oceans brings problems like ocean acidification, but it prevents even higher concentrations of CO2 in the atmosphere.
An added ~19 billion tonnes of CO2 in the #atmosphere during the past decade, with ~40 billion tonnes emitted by humans and ~22 billion tonnes removed by the #land and #ocean sinks (past decade).
Recent drought-related #wildfires have underscored how #climate change can increase fire risks regionally.
But various factors (e.g. human ignitions/suppression, vegetation growth) control fire, making regional fire patterns horribly complex!
It's tough to distill all these complexities into general statements, so here's a thread to showcase what π° observations can reveal about π₯ trends at various regional scales.
I invite you to get lost in the maps that follow and appreciate the complexity in all its glory! π€
First up, a basic question: Where do most fires happen?
π Plot shows mean annual burned area during 2001-2020, summed within regions and mapped thematically.
But how has lockdown impacted #emissions in individual countries?
2/ The reductions in global emissions during January and February were driven by lockdown in China, the βepicentreβ of the virus outbreak.
International expansion of confinement measures led to deeper emissions cuts in March and April.
3/
The total decrease in emissions reached ~25% in China and India. About two-thirds of the peak reductions were caused by retractions in the industry and power sectors.
#FireWeather refers to periods when fire is more likely due to hot, dry, and often windy conditions
Fire weather is an overall measure of the flammability of the landscape - increases suggest rising fire risk
Observations show that fire weather seasons have lengthened across ~25% of the Earthβs vegetated surface, resulting in a ~20% increase in the length of the fire weather season on average globally