Thread by @Hiranyareta

Hey @HartoshSinghBal, you are Khalistani because of this.Notice use of the word "foundational" by u.@MakrandParanspe

External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @HartoshSinghBal view original on Twitter

The British Raj left a legacy in Punjab, the cancerous Tat Khalsa Singh Sabha. The Gangotri of Khalistan or Malechha Sikhi.

Padre M.A. Macauliffe (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Arthu…) was the real brain behind this Singh Sabha with Kahn Singh Nabha & Vir Singh as Sancho Panza

Main objectives for Macauliffe was to inculcate loyalty within Sikhs for the British Raj. Macauliffe states his agenda.

The British Raj utilized Tat Khalsa Singh Sabha to negate Hinduism in the name of ‘reform’ and model Sikhism in d molld of monotheism.

Tat Khalsa Singh Sabha-sponsored scholars began to dismiss, or expunge, or destroy, or alter any text/manuscript with mention of Hinduism.

When Bhai Vir Singh published Rattan Singh Bhangu’s ‘Pracheen Panth Prakash’, he removed things which he deemed Hindu eg Chandi Puja.

The former S.G.P.C.-elected Jathedar of the Akal Takht, Giani Kirpal Singh on the editing by Vir Singh.

Bhai Vir Singh,Sancho Panxa of Padre Macauliffe, distorted Kavi Santokh Singh’s great work,‘Siri Gur Partap Suraj Granth’ in similar manner.

Sikh scholar, poet, and historian, Giani Gian Singh Nirmala on Bhai Vir Singh.

Hew Mcleod on Kahn Singh's ‘Gurmat Sudhakar’, Tat Khalsa Singh Sabha authorized ‘Rehit Nama’.

One will have to read Prof @VishwaAdluri's "Nay Science" to understand Protestant nature of expunging & editing by Vir Singh & Kahn Singh.

Kahn Singh instigated Teja Singh Bhasauria, one of the leaders of the fanatical Panch Khalsa Diwan, to fuel the ‘Raagmala’ issue.

Teja Singh was such a monotheistic fanatic that he wanted to edit Guru Granth itself and expunge Banis from Namdev.
sikhiwiki.org/index.php/Babu…

SGPC was born out of this Tat Khalsa Singh Sabha and it has continued the Abrahamization of Sikhs eg google Nanakshahi vs Vikram calender.

And stand taken by SGPC on this issue.

So Mr Bal, if you consider Missionary sponsored Kahn Singh Nabha's work as "foundational", you are a Khalistani.

Also, check section 8.3 of the book by @Koenraad_Elst showing how British had been disappointed with the 1+

voiceofdharma.org/books/wiah/ch8…

conclusions of the first scholar who investigated and translated Sikh Scriptures, the German Indologist and missionary Dr. E. Trumpp, 2+

who had found Guru Nanak a “thorough Hindu” and his religion “a Pantheism derived directly from Hindu sources”. 3+

So, Macauliffe was put to work to rewrite Sikh history in the sense desired by the British. And thus started Tat Khalsa Singh Sabha.