Disgraced ex-ceo of #CambridgeAnalytica was already in hot water with Parliament @CommonsCMS for misleading statements. Now two Democrats on HSPCI say Nix wasn’t truthful to them during his interview. buzzfeed.com/thomasfrank/tw… via @ByTomFrank
Related: @JoaquinCastrotx spars with Texas AG over whether to probe #CambridgeAnalytica further underscoring Republican’s lack of interest in getting to the truth about the firm that has tainted America’s democracy. sacurrent.com/the-daily/arch…
Parscale distances himself from #CambridgeAnalytica today, per the article above. But immediately after the election, he was on TV using their terminology (echoed by Theresa Hong on BBC) while describing their success.
Former #CambridgeAnalytica director of product Matt Ozcowski says today that their data and RNC data were separate. Right after the election, he was on TV and didn’t feel it was necessary to make that point.
Contrast the statements in the article at the top of the thread with what Theresa Hong and Alexander Nix say to @JamieJBartlett for his BBC special.
The AggregateIQ source code breach provides additional forensic evidence to question Parscale and Ozcowski’s claims that RNC data did not get blended with tainted #CambridgeAnalytica data.
The GOP data operatives excel at telling reporters that Cambridge Analytica was snake oil and it was RNC data that had the juice. If only it were that simple.
