I SMELL A RAT
1. A short time after I posted my thread, "A New Line Of Inquiry," on Thursday May 10th, @KimStrassel published her now infamous article "About that FBI "Source," in the WSJ. The question; who is @DevinNunes seeking information on in the IC?
wsj.com/articles/about…
1. A short time after I posted my thread, "A New Line Of Inquiry," on Thursday May 10th, @KimStrassel published her now infamous article "About that FBI "Source," in the WSJ. The question; who is @DevinNunes seeking information on in the IC?
wsj.com/articles/about…
2. Assuming that you have read "A new line of inquiry" providing the backstory, and now know that my theory points to Stefen Halper as the object of Nunes inquiry, lets discuss the implications of what this might mean to the Mueller investigation, even if my guess is incorrect.
3. We return again to @KimStrassel who is the tip of the spear on this story at the moment. The word "mole" has been used to describe the person of interest, but I believe that is misleading. Listen carefully to @KimStrassel's response at 2:39 when asked if the person was within
4. the campaign and feeding them (FBI) information. @KimStrassel demurs and instead says this person was "at least interacting with the campaign." She further clarifies by describing the subject as a "source," meaning someone interacting with the campaign and reporting back,..
5. ...not necessarily someone who is an active participant in the Trump campaign for president. She emphasizes that the term "source" is an important distinction.
.
.
6, One more important point before we arrive at the possible implications. Again we return to @KimStrassel's comments in another FOX interview. Here, she again explains what we know about the "source." A U.S. citizen with ties to the CiA and FBI who is maybe based overseas....
7. ...and based on those bread crumbs, @KimStrassel says she has a pretty good sense of who the "source" is (as do I). With that in mind she makes, what is to me, the most telling statement yet about the sensational nature of what we may be about to learn about this whole thing.
8. The timing! "The timing is so important here," says @KimStrassel. Why is the timing so important? At the end of 2017, when the corrupt nature of the dossier was becoming public, "mysteriously," the NYT published an article stating that Papadop was the origin not the dossier.
10. Ever since, the FBI has clung to the story that Papadop was what instigated the whole Russian Investigation. Well, now we have a BIG problem.
Keeping in mind that @KimStrassel "knows"who the assets is, listen to what she says next.
Keeping in mind that @KimStrassel "knows"who the assets is, listen to what she says next.
11. "if for any reason we find out that this asset was surveilling [interacting] with the campaign prior to Papadop, then they've got an issue, right?"
I'll say they do. Now it's time to examine the implications of what we think we know.
I'll say they do. Now it's time to examine the implications of what we think we know.
12. If Kim knows who this person is, her point suggests to me that she KNOWS the source was on the team before Papadop, and that more intrigue is on the way. Oh my! Now, how is the DOJ going to explain that? If they now say it wasn't Papadop, they've kept something from Congress.
13. I strongly suspect they've kept it from Congress because whatever it is, its going to reflect very poorly on former Obama officials and those currently overseeing the Mueller investigation. No justification for investigating?
Here is the Interview
Here is the Interview
14. Whew, that is a lot to absorb. Now, since I'm getting tired, & also scared I'll lose my thread again before I can post it, I will save my conjecture about who this "source" is and I what I think they were doing to set up the Trump team for the next thread. Or we could hint.👇
15. With this huge hint [ see attached tweet ] you should be able to conclude for yourself what the Obama team did to set up team Trump, without me having to write another thread.
What impact will this revelation have on the Mueller investigation?
What impact will this revelation have on the Mueller investigation?
Addendum: You don't even need a hint now, @TheLastRefuge2 has laid out the whole shebang here in vivid detail. 👇
Addendum: in case I was not clear enough in the hint #15
@Techno_Fog writes:
“The IC fed George Papadopoulos Russian info”
We believe Stefen Halper was the (IC) who fed Papadop the Russian intel thereby setting him up to be the “target” of the investigation.
Dirty tricks!
@Techno_Fog writes:
“The IC fed George Papadopoulos Russian info”
We believe Stefen Halper was the (IC) who fed Papadop the Russian intel thereby setting him up to be the “target” of the investigation.
Dirty tricks!
