THREAD 1/ From @jsolomonReports piece @thehill today on Bruce Ohr. Papadopoulos stated he got the "Russians have damaging info on Hillary" "tip" from Mifsud, so if FBI had "indisputably exculpatory" evidence, that means either Papa or Mifsud were not implicated. Which one? 
2/ Papadopoulos is about to be sentenced. But Mifsud? Mifsud was "interviewed" and sent on his way out of U.S. AND FBI tried to find out what Papadopoulos knew by sending in Halper as a confidential human source. But FBI didn't use same technique on Mifsud. Why not? Because FBI
3/ either already had info. clearing Mifsud OR just didn't care that Mifsud was the supposed Russia agent. thefederalist.com/2018/09/04/pap… But second bigger point: FISA applications in Oct 2016, Jan. 2016, April 2017, and June 2017 all relied on Papadopoulos & info re dirt on Hillary
4/4 Why? If indisputably exculpatory evidence? Info should NOT have been in applications. This should be huge news. I feel like I'm screaming into the wind because MSM would rather publish annonymous Op-Eds!!! END THREAD
