Thread by @ystriyahysteria

Fuck, this article is REVOLTING.
Man undergoes body modification regime at age 42, proclaims himself a woman, breaks up his marriage, loses his friends..

2 years later, he joins a women's tackle football team.
He has a martial arts black belt, & is a marathon runner.

https://twitter.com/E8Emma/status/1076363903414779904

The women players NOTICE that Christina Ginther is a man, well duh.
This is TACKLE football, where you TACKLE people.

Well hmm maybe the idea of WOMEN being TACKLED by a large MALE felt neither comfortable nor SAFE.

So they said no.
Tsk tsk, how disobedient.
He sued, of course.

So this fucking JURY decided it was this MALE's HUMAN RIGHT to TACKLE WOMEN on a field.

Look at the size of him. Look at his height and the width of his shoulders next to his "team mate" in orange. Imagine him tackling her. What do you thing the outcome would be?

But ALL the sympathy goes to him. Throughout the entire article, the large MALE is the poor VICTIM, just innocently and hopefully looking for a "supportive social group".

The WOMEN, who think their football club isn't the best place for that, are cast as the EVIL VILLAINS.

Another MALE, "Sabreena" Lachlainn had helped rewrite the rules of the Independent WOMEN'S Football League (IWFL), to make sure MALES could join women's teams and TACKLE WOMEN if they so desired.

So it is now forbidden for women to say no to men.

The WOMEN players had to pay their disgruntled, vindictive, unsupportive, hateful, entitled, narcissistic, selfish, anti-women's rights MALE ex-teammate $20,000 because they VIOLATED HIS RIGHT TO TACKLE THEM ($10,000) and by doing so, HURT HIS FEELINGS ($10,000).

Fuck this ABUSE

Women must be punished for rejecting men.
Women must always be punished for rejecting men.

Women must let themselves be tackled and manhandled by men and must be punished if they refuse.

Men have a universally recognized right to dispose of women's bodies as they wish.

How is a local amateur women's football club funded? Do you think they have a spare $20,000 to hand over to this aggressive MALE? Nope, not likely. What are they going to have to give up for his rewards? Travel? Uniforms? Equipment?

And this is just the beginning.

This court case sets a legal precedent.

It's described as a "pioneering business discrimination case".

So, many more legal cases to come where women will punished for saying no to men. Same old same old.

Goodbye, women's sports, was nice while it lasted.

Correction about the IWFL:

"IWFL had changed its eligibility policy in 2012, requiring players to certify that they are & always have been legally & medically female."

Which doesn't seem to have helped though, because the suit was on grounds of violation of the Human Rights Act

Anyway, this article, written by a woman, is abysmal.

No women players were interviewed, the point is to highlight the travails of this poor man who just wanted to tackle some women and the meanies wouldn't let him.

“Everyone was cold toward me.”

Oh no, cold women, how awful.

But we will not give up our rights.
They were so hard won.

Here's Kathleen Switzer, the first women to run the Boston marathon in 1967, when women were not allowed to.
There's Jock Semple, the organizer, violently attacking her to push her out.

runnersworld.com/news/a20852681…

Here's what Kathleen Switzer said to that:

"Thus it was really Jock who gave me the inspiration to create more running opportunities for women. Almost every day of my life I thank him for attacking me, because he gave me this spark."

So, onwards.

Here is the article referenced in this thread.
The link in the first tweet, not missing, was tweeted by @E8Emma, kicked off twitter for excessive feminism, as so many other women.

startribune.com/jury-s-award-t…