, 3 tweets, 2 min read Read on Twitter
A subtle caveat in Barr's statements in his written testimony that he wants to let Mueller finish and be transparent about findings is "where judgments are to be made by me." Under Barr's view of executive power, Trump could direct the AG to substitute his own legal judgments.
From Barr's 1989 confirmation hearing for OLC: In an ambiguous situation where more than one legal conclusion is possible, he would accept a superior's (AG or POTUS) judgment & not resign even if he disagreed. (Also notable: calling the attorney general the "president's lawyer")
This is the import of the anecdote he tells regarding Bush41's hands-off attitude toward DOJ and Pan Am 103 that is the kicker of my story today about Barr's understanding of executive power. nytimes.com/2019/01/14/us/…
Missing some Tweet in this thread?
You can try to force a refresh.

Like this thread? Get email updates or save it to PDF!

Subscribe to Charlie Savage
Profile picture

Get real-time email alerts when new unrolls are available from this author!

This content may be removed anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member and get exclusive features!

Premium member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year)

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!