,
3 tweets,
1 min read
Read on Twitter
Is it just possible that like some of us Maastricht sceptics for whom 2016 was a chance to vote on unfinished business "after the fact", perhaps those provoked by the post-2004 wave of immigration used the 2016 vote in a similar "after the fact" way?
If so, the answer is to have greater direct democracy on governance issues and on societal change issues *at the point they arise*.
Quelling issues so they fester just threatens a bigger blow-out further down the line.
Quelling issues so they fester just threatens a bigger blow-out further down the line.
That comes back to reconnecting the governed with governors.... which was the point of the Leave vote.
