After the attacks, it lifted its hold. (but in 2015, it blocked Indian efforts to investigate how 1 of those designated Lakhvi got bail) 4/
1. Nature/extent of China-Pak rel
2. Chinese interests w/ India
3. US & other efforts to persuade/shame it
4. Perceived reputational costs 5/
- PRC-Pak rels deepened esp post-CPEC
- PRC-India rels more competitive since '08, but PRC has strat/econ interests incl limiting US-Ind rels
- PRC has terrorism concerns, incl in/from Pak 6/
- Pak rel will survive; Pak has few alternatives to PRC
- Pak knows ltd actual effect of designation (Saeed still active)
- Pak can take credit
- Unhappy w/ Pak re this situation & will convey limit of support on terr 9/
- Alleviates 1 problem w/ India (esp public); maybe get quid pro quo
- Gives US 1 less thing to point to when it's reinforcing Indian concerns abt PRC
- De-escalates situation/takes some immediate pressure off Pak
10/
- Impact on Sino-Pak
- Concern re credibility w/ Pak, other partners
- Thinks it won't get credit in India, but US will - & why give US a win
- Blowback in Pak vs PRC interests
- Opens door for more demands to pressure Pak 11/