Thread by @NurtureMyBaby

We KNOW already that @NSPCC has already sacrificed key principles of child safeguarding to satisfy a dangerous ideology. What follows is some excerpts from correspondence between a concerned mother and the NSPCC starting in early 2017

The query regards the Girl Guides trans policy which allows boys to share accommodation with girls without parental knowledge was set out clearly and logically by this concerned mother. Girl Guides Assc had not taken the concerns of the mother seriously hence contacting @NSPCC

Here is an initial response from the NSPCC. Shockingly they don't think a boy sharing accommodation with a girl presents a safeguarding issue.

After the mother writes back to reiterate her points @NSPCC provide this further response. Safeguarding should be the bread and butter of this org but they don't seem to know what female means.

The employee providing these responses on behalf of the @NSPCC then sends out this tweet. (What more can I say?)
@PeterWanless does this individual still work for your organisation?

The mother highlights the unproffesional behaviour and the inadequate response to safeguarding concerns and takes the issue to the CEO @PeterWanless who promises urgent investigation. This was Jan 2017.

It took until April 2018 for Peter to respond to say a meeting and full discussion had taken place.
NSPCC do not seem to grasp that SEX is a protected characteristic. Over a year for a wholly inadequate response

The mother has since raised the matter with all the trustees and board members. They have the full email trail and are yet to provide any sort of adequate response or any recognition of the rights of girls to privacy, safety and dignity via single sex spaces.