Apparently because while your mathematical aptitude may be high, your verbal abilities are not.

You missed the point, since I made it obliquely.

The point is that all scientific data (and mathematical for that point) SAYS NOTHING OF ITSELF. It must always be INTERPRETED.
The immediate corollary of this is that whenever someone claims that “the facts” directly prove HIS theory, HE is lying.

His theory is but one of any number of possible or plausible interpretations of the same data set. Facts alone do not tell us HOW TO INTERPRET THOSE FACTS.
Is that clearer?

I forget I have to speak without nuance or subtlety to the merely mathematically minded.
Missing some Tweet in this thread?
You can try to force a refresh.

Like this thread? Get email updates or save it to PDF!

Subscribe to Eve Keneinan 𝛗☦️ن❌
Profile picture

Get real-time email alerts when new unrolls are available from this author!

This content may be removed anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!