You missed the point, since I made it obliquely.
The point is that all scientific data (and mathematical for that point) SAYS NOTHING OF ITSELF. It must always be INTERPRETED.
His theory is but one of any number of possible or plausible interpretations of the same data set. Facts alone do not tell us HOW TO INTERPRET THOSE FACTS.
I forget I have to speak without nuance or subtlety to the merely mathematically minded.