Thread by @RealSLokhova

Halper's hatchet in the back of Flynn in the media. WSJ's only source for their March 2017 fake story is Halper the "former senior US official with knowledge". BUT "It is not known when [this] came to attention of US intelligence". WSJ just forgot to ask their source? Really? /1

Halper appears in the same article as an expert who knows Flynn did not report the contact with me. WOW Impressive level of knowledge of DIA files for a 74 year old Cambridge Professor! WSJ forgot to ask how he knew that? Sloppy journalism? /2

Halper the professor who has never been the Head of the DIA apparently knows more about reporting responsibility than the Head of the DIA and other officers of the DIA, who said there was nothing to report. And remember that Gen Flynn kept his highest-level security clearance. /3

Halper also 'attended the Flynn dinner' but gets EVERY SINGLE DETAIL WRONG and the @WSJ still 'believe' him??? /4

Remember: Halper's blockbuster allegation to @WSJ was my alleged affair with Gen Flynn. They put it to a number of senior people around University of Cambridge and elsewhere. The response was 'it's a lie'. Yet @WSJ still believed Halper? /5

In summary, despite all of these red flags, Wall Street Journal printed. Surely, the bigger story was how does this 'Cambridge professor' with reputation for dirty tricks on behalf of the CIA know all of this? Now that's a blockbuster story. Come on, @WSJ why not print this now?