, 4 tweets, 2 min read Read on Twitter
Question that goes unasked: WHY?

WHY would the House reach such an agreement?
I'm going to presume this is correct. My point being, that would be a relevant thing to put in the story.
I read a headline like that, my first question is "why?"

I read the whole article, and apparently that question never occurs to the writer? The answer is so obvious to them as to not merit mention?

Now my question is, "Why leave that information out of the story?"
That it expedites the appeal process is in there. Why that's beneficial to the House is not. As written the House agreed to re-block their subpoenas.

As somebody unfamiliar with the intricacies, it would be good to know.
Missing some Tweet in this thread?
You can try to force a refresh.

Like this thread? Get email updates or save it to PDF!

Subscribe to A.R. Moxon (Julius Goat)
Profile picture

Get real-time email alerts when new unrolls are available from this author!

This content may be removed anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!