,
5 tweets,
5 min read
Read on Twitter
1. what is wrong about this #US report by @CRS4Congress on Julian #Assange? fas.org/sgp/crs/secrec… i) it refers to #Swedish charges, though to this day there are NO charges at all
2. every journalist worth his/her salt knows the difference between an individual under investigation (allegations) and an individual who is supposed to stand trial (charges): to this day, the Swedish prosecutors have NOT decided whether to charge #Assange for rape (minor rape)
3. is it credible that the @crs4research does NOT know the difference between *allegations* and *charges*, considering the 1000s of press reports on the Julian #Assange Swedish case ?
4. also unacceptable: the @crs4research completely omits that the @UNHumanRights body in charge of establising who is arbitrarily detained, #UNWGAD, established that the UK and Swedish governments have arbitrarily detained #Assange since 2010.
5. the @foreignoffice tried to appeal #UNWGAD decision on #Assange and LOST. the #UNWGAD's decision on Julian #Assange stands: the UK remains responsible for his arbitrary detention. @UNHumanRights' #UNWGAD called for Julian #Assange's release over and over
