But back then i was naive enough to think progressive parties might come together
And instead can we spend the time asking
WHAT THE FOOK ARE PROGRESSIVE PARTIES DOING FIGHTING INTERNALLY AND EXTERNALLY. UNITE YOU UTTER MUPPETS OR RISK👇
Despite idiot's warning, this is English law in our unwritten constitution. Vague
In any other constitutional democracy Consent of the Governed would prevent after event vote misappropriation ->Divine Rule/ Tyranny
Unfortunately, despite ERG mendacity* it lies with Parliament (see Miller).
This all creates the sort of circular legal logic that is the Barrister's retirement fund...
There is however no statute on Government by Consent in law, which theoretically means we don't know or haven't tested if we're a Democracy.
So we're testing our Democracy, and until we have precedent or statute Consent is...persuasive?
The second problem is whose consent?
BUT IF Parliament consents then Boris Queen's speech has traps galore. You see them right? 🤔