This is why we can't get people to understand the truth.
This tweet below is absolutely false, the article actually says the exact opposite of the person tweeting it. I am hoping @ScottTBrower1 will delete this ridiculous tweet, but I want this thread as a lesson!
This tweet below is absolutely false, the article actually says the exact opposite of the person tweeting it. I am hoping @ScottTBrower1 will delete this ridiculous tweet, but I want this thread as a lesson!
I'm going to screen shot it here, just in case he does make the right decision & pulls this tweet.
The lesson is necessary. This Hill article has absolutely nothing to do with Mueller or Rosenstein. Nothing, in fact the article says the exact opposite as I will describe.
The lesson is necessary. This Hill article has absolutely nothing to do with Mueller or Rosenstein. Nothing, in fact the article says the exact opposite as I will describe.
The article describes an effort by the Trump DOJ to redact information in a filing triggered by Democratic members of Congress are demanding Grand Jury information.
This is an Obama judge ruling that the DOJ can't not tell who was not called before a grand jury.
This is an Obama judge ruling that the DOJ can't not tell who was not called before a grand jury.
The article points out that Mueller & Rosenstein DID NOT REDACT the names in the Special Counsel's Reports. So this claim that they redacted the names to protect the Swamp is exactly the opposite of what the article highlights.
So this is Trump's AAG redacting names of people who didn't get questioned by the grand jury, to conceal from Dems in Congress who Mueller didn't put in front of a grand jury. Which may clue them in to which allegations Mueller never bothered presenting...
But ridiculous interpretations like this tweet will continue to blind people to the truth, which merely drags out this entire process. This is either an own goal by this poster, or they are intentionally helping the Dems here. Because as long as Republicans believe this, we lose.
