#KamleshTiwari is now a devta, a hero, a martyr
He was a Hindu, who used to work for the Hindu cause w/ true faith
He was a braveheart, who fought against an evil enemy
I salute this Hindu martyr
But I feel his strategy ultimately strengthened the enemy & endangered the cause
He was a Hindu, who used to work for the Hindu cause w/ true faith
He was a braveheart, who fought against an evil enemy
I salute this Hindu martyr
But I feel his strategy ultimately strengthened the enemy & endangered the cause
It may sound counter-intuitive but every abusive attack on their prophet has always strengthened their ideology, increased the hold of their core on the periphery, made them more cohesive.
This is especially the case, when the abuse/criticism is not supported by their texts
2/n
This is especially the case, when the abuse/criticism is not supported by their texts
2/n
The way to weaken the enemy is to:
1. prevent them from availing of any political or administrative power
2. neutralize all means and incidents of psychological & physical intimidation
3. crime lends them an aura of strength over kufr law. Straitjacket their criminal potential
1. prevent them from availing of any political or administrative power
2. neutralize all means and incidents of psychological & physical intimidation
3. crime lends them an aura of strength over kufr law. Straitjacket their criminal potential
4. shown own history as superior
5. show own lifestyle as superior
6. liberate their women
7. compete with them on reproductive rates
8. do not allow any separate laws and provisions
9. do not allow public prayers
10. do not allow any one of them to threaten you
FIN
5. show own lifestyle as superior
6. liberate their women
7. compete with them on reproductive rates
8. do not allow any separate laws and provisions
9. do not allow public prayers
10. do not allow any one of them to threaten you
FIN
11. Take down all external forces to whom your enemy looks up for motivation & pride, which includes our neighbor to the west.
This system of neutralizing the enemy was to be slowly built up over the next ten years. The screws were to be gradually tightened in a deliberate and systematic way.
Remember one can't slowly boil the frog if one pokes it with a stick. It will jump out of the pan.
Remember one can't slowly boil the frog if one pokes it with a stick. It will jump out of the pan.
Why is NaMo strategy and Hindus not in sync?
Because Hindus usually look for victory in realms of debate & argumentation, by responding to critique & provocations, as if winning some debate points, or decibel level guarantees one a victory over the enemy's ideology! It doesn't.
Because Hindus usually look for victory in realms of debate & argumentation, by responding to critique & provocations, as if winning some debate points, or decibel level guarantees one a victory over the enemy's ideology! It doesn't.
NaMo acts differently. He puts enemy/python at ease, and then he builds the chakravyuha, or at least that part of it that happens to be within his capacity.
In order to do so, of course he will not be announcing his each and every move or making 56" threats!
Hindu don't get it!
In order to do so, of course he will not be announcing his each and every move or making 56" threats!
Hindu don't get it!
Response by Ms to this is usually
1. Issue a fatwa against one of the most prominent abusers
2. One of the radicalized goes and makes a kill
3. Millions rejoice openly
It is treated like a sport, and the collective hyped up rage & jubilation unites 'em
1. Issue a fatwa against one of the most prominent abusers
2. One of the radicalized goes and makes a kill
3. Millions rejoice openly
It is treated like a sport, and the collective hyped up rage & jubilation unites 'em
Response of Hs to that could be
1. seething anger at Ms
2. anger at own politicos in not ensuring safety of the murdered H
3. riots - usually two sided
4. more online abuse of Mo
W/ violence like this one manages to teach "lesson" only at a local level restricted to 1 genrtn
1. seething anger at Ms
2. anger at own politicos in not ensuring safety of the murdered H
3. riots - usually two sided
4. more online abuse of Mo
W/ violence like this one manages to teach "lesson" only at a local level restricted to 1 genrtn
However one sees it, end-result is a stronger, more cohesive, more elated and more determined M community.
It is not the abusing of Mo, I mind per some high moral principle. I reject it, because it doesn't work and ends up doing just the opposite.
It is not the abusing of Mo, I mind per some high moral principle. I reject it, because it doesn't work and ends up doing just the opposite.
Here some were shocked that no Ms condemned the killing of #KamleshTiwari.
There is no reason for shock. This part & parcel of the community-wide celebration of achieving the kill.
The murderers have provided a reason for celebration for 100s of millions
There is no reason for shock. This part & parcel of the community-wide celebration of achieving the kill.
The murderers have provided a reason for celebration for 100s of millions
My emphasis here isn't on despicable murder of our Hindu brother.
It is abt Hs creating circumstances in which Ms can play a sport which further provides them cohesion, oneness of purpose & triumphalism.
In the end Hs who abuse Mo inadvertently end up strengthening the ideology
It is abt Hs creating circumstances in which Ms can play a sport which further provides them cohesion, oneness of purpose & triumphalism.
In the end Hs who abuse Mo inadvertently end up strengthening the ideology
That is why I say, the most apparent pain-spot of the enemy is not his weak spot.
In fact, Islamists internally feel a huge sense of glee when a non-M abuses Mo, as it means they can play their assassination olympics and as it strengthens their hold over the M community.
In fact, Islamists internally feel a huge sense of glee when a non-M abuses Mo, as it means they can play their assassination olympics and as it strengthens their hold over the M community.
I don't expect many Hindus to concur with me on this.
But this has been what my analysis of the past decade has led me to.
But this has been what my analysis of the past decade has led me to.
This is how easily Mullahs play Hindu leaders
1. They give Hs an irresistible debate target
2. Hs jump on bone and try to prove it wrong
3. Mullahs rejoice that Hs ended up doing propaganda for Ms, as their intention was to prove Mo's ruthlessness anywy
1. They give Hs an irresistible debate target
2. Hs jump on bone and try to prove it wrong
3. Mullahs rejoice that Hs ended up doing propaganda for Ms, as their intention was to prove Mo's ruthlessness anywy
What is worrying is that even after 100s of years of oppression under 'slamics, H thought leaders fail to understand 'slam's psychological framework.
Through usual H debating points, Hs cannot dent the combo of victimization narratives, entitlement, ruthlessness, shamelessness!
Through usual H debating points, Hs cannot dent the combo of victimization narratives, entitlement, ruthlessness, shamelessness!
Why does he say so?
Because a person's character is invulnerable, if he wears an armor of shamelessness.
Strength of this shamelessness armor derives from a history of success & victory over Kufr and a successful cloaking of defeat beneath victimization
Because a person's character is invulnerable, if he wears an armor of shamelessness.
Strength of this shamelessness armor derives from a history of success & victory over Kufr and a successful cloaking of defeat beneath victimization
Hs say fight against ideology. With what? with debate? with hurling abuses at Mo?
That is simply the wrong approach. Ideology is pretty much water-tight.
Only weakness is that it is based on victory, on victory and subjugation of Kufr.
That is simply the wrong approach. Ideology is pretty much water-tight.
Only weakness is that it is based on victory, on victory and subjugation of Kufr.
So in order to attain victory over ideology, Hs have to win fight on the ground by degrading each and every institution that strengthens them:
1. power of intimidation at street level
2. demographic growth difference
3. criminal enterprise
4. fatwa olympics
5. ghetto forts
1. power of intimidation at street level
2. demographic growth difference
3. criminal enterprise
4. fatwa olympics
5. ghetto forts
6. public spaces takeovers
7. secular H girls
8. control over M women
9. LeLi-Sickular ecosystem
10. electoral vote-banks
11. Baxis & Turushkas
12. Mullihs as sole arbitrators
13. Bollywoodiya swag
14. Food joints offering only Halal
......
7. secular H girls
8. control over M women
9. LeLi-Sickular ecosystem
10. electoral vote-banks
11. Baxis & Turushkas
12. Mullihs as sole arbitrators
13. Bollywoodiya swag
14. Food joints offering only Halal
......
I want each and every H to ask himself ...
Is there anything you can say about their ideology, society or behavior, which could possibly shame them?
Yes, there is. Stories & pics of their cowardice & defeat wd do that.
But talk of any principles is all water off a duck's back!
Is there anything you can say about their ideology, society or behavior, which could possibly shame them?
Yes, there is. Stories & pics of their cowardice & defeat wd do that.
But talk of any principles is all water off a duck's back!
H-Mind & M-Mind are completely opposite.
H believes in Truth, Values, Shame, Hard Work, Love, Loyalty, Duty, Individual Uplifting.
M believes in only Group Think, Indulgence & Victory.
So when you debate Ms, be mindful that you don't up doing more propaganda for them.
H believes in Truth, Values, Shame, Hard Work, Love, Loyalty, Duty, Individual Uplifting.
M believes in only Group Think, Indulgence & Victory.
So when you debate Ms, be mindful that you don't up doing more propaganda for them.
