I'm truly amazed at the "journalists" who know shame in their Russia collusion reporting. I made two mistakes in the last 2 years and it still horrifies me, even though neither was substantive & one was predictive and in long run turned out true. 1/
2/ I had said it was impossible to know whether Sullivan had changed the standing order in Flynn's case b/c the cases I pulled showed the old one & I didn't find any of his recent cases w/ new one. I should have searched harder b/c others found cases so it was possible to know.
3/ And I said a plea w/draw was likely in the works by Flynn's original attorneys. Now this was predictive, but I should haven't have framed that way, although I can't imagine they didn't discuss it. AND if they didn't it was for bad reasons/conflicts, etc.
4/4 But my analysis of the facts has been spot on. See this obnoxious brag. Yet, those 2 minor points haunt me as a journalist. How are the "journalists" who got Trump collusion so wrong not horrified with their reporting? END
