I just read some Republican response to Schiff's presentation, and the most common response I saw was this:
"The part Schiff left out was that Sondland testified that Trump said there was no quid pro quo."
🤦♀️
I think that's the level we can expect.
#TrumpImpeachmentTrial
"The part Schiff left out was that Sondland testified that Trump said there was no quid pro quo."
🤦♀️
I think that's the level we can expect.
#TrumpImpeachmentTrial
Look at it this way. With a straight face they can say both of these things:
🔹All the evidence is hearsay!
🔹Trump has the right to prevent his advisors from testifying!
(They're also misrepresenting the law regarding hearsay, but I'm out of room in this tweet to explain)
🔹All the evidence is hearsay!
🔹Trump has the right to prevent his advisors from testifying!
(They're also misrepresenting the law regarding hearsay, but I'm out of room in this tweet to explain)
Here you go. The defense presents its case: The words "quid pro quo" appear nowhere in the Articles of Impeachment.
