, 11 tweets, 3 min read
My Authors
Read all threads
Appears there are at least two critical unknowns about #2019nCoV #coronavirus that, once we have more information on them, will help further focus response efforts.
These are: 1) whether (and how often) people can spread the virus preceding the development of symptoms (asymptomatic transmission), and 2) how often infection with the virus leads to severe disease.
Some conflicting information out there on asymptomatic transmission. China's health minister says yes it does occur with this virus, while one of CDC’s top experts says they haven’t seen any evidence of that yet, but are investigating. washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pac…
With no (or little) asymptomatic transmission, response can focus on infection control, identifying and isolating symptomatic cases, & tracing and monitoring their contacts. That tried and true public health approach helped interrupt many outbreaks, from SARS to Ebola.
If significant asymptomatic transmission is present, the tried and true method may identify some people who need care, but doesn’t identify all those infected and transmitting the virus. Therefore, chains of infection keep propagating.
That would be a more influenza-like scenario. Hard to contain such an outbreak without broader, potentially disruptive measures. In addition to isolation and infection control as above, authorities might institute social distancing measures (closing schools, public events, etc).
Another key effort in such a scenario would be to rapidly developing vaccines, and deploy them as widely as possible in the population at risk.
For point 2), the severity, we don’t really know how many people total have been infected so we can’t calculate an accurate case fatality ratio. Estimates from the modelers put the true number of cases at 50,000 or even 100,000 or more. theguardian.com/science/2020/j…
If those modeled estimates are close to true, the fact that relatively few deaths have been noted so far points to something less severe than, say, SARS.
But, it could be that the infected haven’t progressed to severe disease yet, and we might see a very sharp rise in the severe cases and deaths in the coming days. That indeed would be a very bad sign, and be cause for great concern.
Not trying to draw parallels, but early estimates of the severity of 2009-H1N1 influenza were fairly high and caused a lot of concern. Turned out severity was close to that of seasonal influenza (still caused a lot of deaths and severe disease because it spread so much, though).
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh.

Enjoying this thread?

Keep Current with Josh Michaud

Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!