The Hill made John Solomon an "opinion contributor" over internal concerns that his work lacked rigor -- then discovered that because his columns still *looked* like news stories, this "blurred the distinction between news and opinion in the minds of some readers." Whoops!
Solomon... didn't report to anyone in the newsroom? 
The Hill seems to have produced a pretty clear-eyed review of the systemic failures that allowed it to play a key role in a massive disinformation campaign. Bad on them for needing to do it, but good on them for doing it. Meanwhile...
There are 701 words in the editor's note appended to Solomon's column, "As Russia collusion fades, Ukrainian plot to help Clinton emerges" thehill.com/opinion/campai…
