The original inspiration for this piece was the newly marketed antiviral pills by Pfizer and Merck for the treatment of COVID-19. I thought with hearing so much about vaccines this year, and with pills entering the arena, people might be curious about what each does in the body.
When I started researching, I quickly learned that there were many types of vaccines. Here's one chart I found that explains this (left; by Nikita Ramesh, made with @BioRender). My first idea (right) was to convey ALL these types of vaccines against antivirals.
Fun Fact: I discovered that there is a yet-to-be-approved plant-based vaccine created by Canadian pharma company @medicagoinc. "Plant-based" here means that the "antigen" is a virus-like particle created by bacteria in plants medicago.com/en/our-technol…
My first idea became too demanding the more I worked on it. I was running out of "infographic real-estate", and I was being forced to cram information. I tried reshuffling so that I could introduce the necessity of an antigen, but the message was still TOO big.
(Note: I could have just made it longer, but I knew this was going to be a bit of a "drier" piece and I didn't want to create a long, boring story, especially for a general audience. Also, I am personally not a fan of very long vertical pieces: scrollytelling gets boring, fast)
After some internal discussion with the VC team, we decided to streamline the message to compare major vaccines (currently: mRNA) and the two antiviral pills. This made the piece easier to read, w/ a cleaner comparison, and offered more room to expand on the science in each.
Here, I was becoming more satisfied with the editorial potential: I could see a nice, big cell in my mind's eye as the hero graphic. Also, having two stories running parallel was a cool opportunity. Once this part was done, I moved on to figuring out how to "dress up" the piece.
I wanted to do something different (I always want to break the mould). I really didn't want to do "realistic" drawings of the cell; it felt too obvious and everyone else is doing it (to me, that's boring/cliche). So I thought: This topic is complicated. How can I show it simply?
This is where I began exploring the simple-vector idea, and drafted some early concepts by playing around with the Pen-tool in Photoshop (Fun Mark Fact: I really despise Illustrator, so I made all of this in Photoshop).
I was still unsatisfied with the look. It read "flat" and not engaging enough for my tastes. This is where I had the idea to amplify the simplicity by incorporating paper-craft visuals...an idea that I thought would make science "feel" simple and approachable.
I really liked how less "serious" and intimidating the paper-craft style looked: it felt fun and unique! I continued designing most of the assets to reflect this style choice, and I had a lot of fun doing it ☺️ Here are some close-ups I really like:
Wrt the science: it was relatively easy to explain the mRNA vaccine process step-by-step, but describing two different pills and how they worked in one space was tricky. I had to simplify it somehow. I went through several iterations of simplification:
^ That final iteration is so satisfying to me: turning proteases into mini x-acto knives (they cut!🔪), showing the cut-up polyprotein, and showing how to prevent it was to me a big improvement from the original illustration, which wasn't describing much.
Aside: I like my text treatment here. Instead of labelling everything, I chose color coordination to visually associate words with the illustrations. This is something I picked up from playing the Legend of Zelda games (they do something similar).
While simplifying the antiviral story, I also changed the infographic layout: I opened it up by removing some elements. Looking at the original felt cramped/claustrophobic and stressful. It just felt right to strip back the cagey-elements and let the piece breathe a bit.
^ I also had to make a sacrifice on the opening exposition from the first piece (which was kinda redundant/not interesting, anyway!) ✂️ Less is more!
Just a few post-production edits, color touch-ups, and some magic-making in Photoshop to make things *pop* just a tiiiiny bit more, and you've got the final poster! 💉💊✨
This one was a lot of fun, and despite so many changes, it took about a week to produce. As always, I like to include a process gif, so here it is!
First - I love the stippling illustrations. This is a nice technique that offers good contrast between structures.
The labelling, however, is a serious impediment to the eye. Subconsciously, our brains are trying to break this down + are taxed with making sense of this info🧠⚡️
When we visually communicate technical images, we need to be mindful of how the eye travels, what information it's picking apart, and how we can alleviate any strain or taxation that may interfere with - and disrupt - our ability to absorb new information.
There was already a graphic explaining the key findings in the paper, shown here. It's a really nice Treemap visualization using a #voronoi pattern (random Fun Fact: voronois are everywhere in biology: bone matrices, cell shapes, wing scales, etc.)
Good morning followers, new and not-new! After the flux of newcomers this weekend, I thought I’d introduce a little bit more about me + my journey so far to becoming a scientific/data illustrator. Read within! ⬇️🧵🪞🔬👨🏻🎓 #bio#aboutme#art#artist#scientificillustration#sciart
My name's Mark and I am super passionate about telling science stories with the power of visual media🎨 I love illustration, I learn best with visuals, and I am constantly looking for (er, doodling?) ways to make pictures say MORE than just "a thousand words” 😉
I've always been drawn to art as a kid. Ever since I could hold a pencil, I've been creatively engaged. Growing up I was discouraged from pursuing art (who wasn't?) and so I gradually developed an interest in science. Natural History is my favourite subject. 🌐🪱🐒🦀🦩🍄🪸🪐✨
Since 1900, we've been making a LOT of stuff...and it's been piling up. In 2020, the material output of humans on Earth SURPASSED the total (dry) weight of all living things on Earth!
One grim part to this story (there's many 😵💫) is that we've now produced double the weight of plastic than the entire Animal Kingdom.
This one is a fun topic for me - I've always been fascinated with society's disdain for Pluto's downgrade, but the complete lack of interest for the other members of Pluto's family!!
You'll notice there's more than 5 of the IAU's recognized dwarf planets. This is because I referenced additional planets that are agreed upon by @plutokiller, @GonzaloTancredi, and Will Grundy @LowellObs. Depending who you ask, there's more!