@MEJLean & his colleagues have done it.
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.11…
The methodology is sound - meaning the conclusions are robust /1
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6895a/6895a1ce28a04abddf9517cd3e5fba7871dfcfaf" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9739b/9739bc3e331c1fd63187754ccde60aa3f635317f" alt=""
"Publication acceptance & citations appear to favour apparently larger effect sizes above methodological quality.”
Mirrors our recent experience in this area:
Showing us noise is outweighing the signal and no diet more superior than another.
Here’s one example where ‘evidence-based’ applies.