First read this:
Seems like this would be a pretty bad way for a party insider to frame the aims of the Democratic party, no?
Seems like this would be a pretty bad way for a party insider to frame the aims of the Democratic party, no?
Apparently, it seems @USATODAY has determined that Trump is able to act as a spokesperson for @TheDemocrats as well as those who vote with their party.
It's clearly presented as a fact, not an opinion.
It's clearly presented as a fact, not an opinion.
Yet I don't want "open borders socialism"... Do U?
In fact, this seems like a statement that not only degrades the policy position, but could do real financial harm to those who identify as Democrats by portraying them as irrational, unreasonable, Russian influenced agents.
In fact, this seems like a statement that not only degrades the policy position, but could do real financial harm to those who identify as Democrats by portraying them as irrational, unreasonable, Russian influenced agents.
'Cause that's what Veneuzuela is... a Russian influenced authoritarian state with a hyperfocus on Oil that intentionally divides the populace to foment civil violence.
And that sure doesn't remind me of what @TheDemocrats are working towards...
And that sure doesn't remind me of what @TheDemocrats are working towards...
