Media Claims Facts About Khashoggi's Terror Ties are "Conspiracy Theories" frontpagemag.com/point/271637/m…
The media's current definition of a conspiracy theory is any fact that it doesn't like. Its definition of a fact is any conspiracy theory that it agrees with.
Trump being a Russian agent is a "fact". While the fact that Khashoggi was tied to terrorist is a "conspiracy theory".
Trump being a Russian agent is a "fact". While the fact that Khashoggi was tied to terrorist is a "conspiracy theory".
This began with Don Jr. retweeting national security expert Patrick Poole. Poole had cited a propaganda piece written by Khashoggi touting his old friend, Osama bin Laden.
And the media, which keeps lying and claiming that Muslim Brotherhood member Jamal Khashoggi is a martyr for secular free speech or something, scrambled to attack it by calling it a conspiracy theory.
E
E
Except that it's the actual article that Khashoggi wrote. Poole put up an image of the actual article. How does one call that a conspiracy theory?
Khashoggi was an old friend of Osama's. He was recruited by a Jihadist funder to come to Afghanistan. And his articles there, of which this is one example, read like Jihadist propaganda.
What does all this mean?
According to the media, conspiracy theories are facts. And facts are conspiracy theories. The existence of an article is an unproven assertion. But the unproven assertions of the Turkish Islamist regimes are facts.
According to the media, conspiracy theories are facts. And facts are conspiracy theories. The existence of an article is an unproven assertion. But the unproven assertions of the Turkish Islamist regimes are facts.
