Sounds like someone big is resisting a subpoena. cnn.com/2018/12/14/pol…
.@joshgerstein what say? You were on this back in October...
“In the more shadowy case, which involves an unknown person summoned before a grand jury this summer, the D.C. Circuit on Monday set a separate round of arguments for Dec. 14.”
Today is Dec. 14
politico.com/story/2018/10/…
“In the more shadowy case, which involves an unknown person summoned before a grand jury this summer, the D.C. Circuit on Monday set a separate round of arguments for Dec. 14.”
Today is Dec. 14
politico.com/story/2018/10/…
After @joshgerstein’s October scoop about this mystery Mueller proceeding, Nelson Cunningham, a former Federal Prosecutor, wrote this opinion piece for @politico theorizing who the subpoena might have targeted.
politico.com/magazine/story…
politico.com/magazine/story…
And here’s @joshgerstein’s piece on today’s happening. I’ve tangled with him over the years. He’s sharp & dogged. If anyone can figure this out, he can.
politico.com/story/2018/12/…
politico.com/story/2018/12/…
Deafening silence from the legal eagles about what this court fight could be. I guess they’re as perplexed as we are. But we need them!
In the meantime a smart thread from @HoarseWisperer.
And in response @dcpoll has suggested Ty Cobb might fit the bill.
In the meantime a smart thread from @HoarseWisperer.
And in response @dcpoll has suggested Ty Cobb might fit the bill.
BREAKING:
The appeals court has upheld Mueller’s mystery subpoena, which we now know a little more about: the recipient is “The Corporation” owned by “Country A” and they are resisting under the The Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of 1976 (FSIA).
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreign_S…
The appeals court has upheld Mueller’s mystery subpoena, which we now know a little more about: the recipient is “The Corporation” owned by “Country A” and they are resisting under the The Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of 1976 (FSIA).
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreign_S…
