He seems to of revised his opinions a bit, read it.
great article.
The science of climate change is anything but settled
By Roy W. Spencer – – Wednesday, March 13, 2019
ANALYSIS/OPINION:
wattsupwiththat.com/2019/03/16/dr-…
European Institute for Climate and Energy ... posted a video of prominent German geologist Dr. Stefan Kröpelin, who in a presentation late last year in Munich called the notion of CO2-induced climate tipping points scientifically outlandish.
notrickszone.com/2019/02/05/lea…
"atmospheric physicist Prof. Nir Shaviv summarizes:
There’s no proof that large changes in CO2 would lead to large temperature changes.”
Overall, EIKE called the debate before the Parliamentary Committee a “debacle for the climate alarmists”.
At the 1:40 mark, Shaviv responded by saying there was “no scientific proof that showed CO2 has a large impact on climate” and that the arguments used by the IPCC to claim otherwise “are faulty”.
notrickszone.com/2018/12/15/cli…
Recently scientists have been walking back CO2’s warming effect, EIKE shows:
notrickszone.com/2018/12/15/cli…
Next astrophysicist Piers Corbyn tells Poels that the amount of man-made Co2 in the atmosphere is like a “tiny blob of birdshit” and calls the claim that this is causing the climate to change “complete, delusional nonsense”.
...astrophysicist Piers Corbyn also believes the globe will see continued cooling until about 2035. He calls the datasets showing warming “frauds”.
notrickszone.com/2018/11/16/ren…
Climate models “very dangerous game”…”they’re wrong”
...Poels makes his way to Princeton where he meets with “living legend” Princeton physicist Freeman Dyson, one of the leading skeptic voices on man-made climate change.
Quality Control Sorely Needed In Climate Science: Half Of Peer-Reviewed Results Non-Replicable, Flawed.
By Kenneth Richard on 8. November 2018
notrickszone.com/2018/11/08/qua…
Within a matter of days after the press release for a newly published Nature paper spewed the usual it’s-worse-than-we-thought headlines throughout the alarmosphere (Washington Post, BBC, New York Times), the paper’s results were assessed to have “major problems”..
..A glaring miscalculation was quickly spotted that changed not only the results, but consequently undermined the conclusion that estimates of climate sensitivity to doubled CO2 may be too low.
..the paper was able to pass through peer review anyway.
notrickszone.com/2018/11/08/qua…
Kirye, who wishes to remain anonymous, said she became skeptical of alarmist climate science in 2013 after having read books by Dr. Kiyohiko Ikeda, Shigenori Maruyama and Kiminori Itoh — rare dissenting voices in Japan.
Shigenori Maruyama, Professor of the Tokyo Institute of Technology.
He is one of the most widely quoted experts in the field of geology and tectonics research in Japan and other Pacific type of accretionary orogens.
Dr. Kiminori Itoh earned his Ph.D. in Industrial Chemistry at the University of Tokyo in 1978. He is the author of the Japanese-language book Lies and Traps in the Global Warming Affair....
Dr. Kiminori Itoh earned his Ph.D. in Industrial Chemistry at the University of Tokyo in 1978.
"stated in reference to climate change that we are facing “the worst scientific scandal in history”,
fcpp.org/2018/06/25/cli…
Dr. Friedrich Karl Ewert is a retired geologist and data computation expert. examined all NASA GISS’s temperature data series.
"look at the raw data, as opposed to NASA’s revisions, you’ll find that since 1940 the planet has been cooling, not warming
breitbart.com/politics/2015/…
"No more global warming"
Yuh Fukai
Professor Emeritus, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Chuo University
Areas of Specialization: Metal Physics, Materials Science, Earth Sciences
yab.yomiuri.co.jp/adv/chuo/dy/op…
notrickszone.com/2018/10/23/cli…
Ralph B. Alexander grew up in Perth, Western Australia, and received his PhD in physics from the University of Oxford
Most scientists who are skeptics like me accept that global warming is real, but not that it’s entirely man-made or that it’s dangerous.
Ralph B. Alexander PhD in physics...
The observations alone aren’t evidence for a major human role. Such lack of regard for the importance of empirical evidence, and misguided faith in the power of deficient computer climate models, are abuses of science.
Collins et al., 2018
...we do not have theories that can adequately explain the reasons for an extreme cold or warm, or wet or dry, winter at continental scales...