,
6 tweets,
2 min read
Read on Twitter
Could this tweet be more perfect to demonstrate that the values espoused by Sheer are fickle and hypocritical?
If every person has value in God’s eyes, then Trudeau and Muslims deserve equal value? No?
If every person has value in God’s eyes, then Trudeau and Muslims deserve equal value? No?
The unspoken qualifier from Scheers speech: some have more value than others in his God’s eyes, but all have value.
Those with less value are fair to target and discriminate against. That’s what freedom of religion means to Scheer and the faith he represents.
Those with less value are fair to target and discriminate against. That’s what freedom of religion means to Scheer and the faith he represents.
Focusing on the mention of God is a distraction. It’s what is implied by labeling everything as valuable, but behaviour indicates otherwise.
If all humans have value, equal value, then Michael Cooper would be expelled from the party.
If all humans have value, equal value, then Michael Cooper would be expelled from the party.
The fact he isn’t means Scheer values Cooper’s beliefs, actions and religious freedom more than the Muslim man whom Cooper humiliated and shamed. The presenters value is categorically less since the callous treatment by Cooper is permitted.
Exactly what the presenter came to the committee to discuss as being linked to the CPC party and its members and promoted by online hate sites.
But Andy has artfully shifted the narrative to play victim.
I question & criticize Cooper’s & Scheer’s obvious absence of values.
But Andy has artfully shifted the narrative to play victim.
I question & criticize Cooper’s & Scheer’s obvious absence of values.
Both Cooper and the presenter have equal value. But by humiliating the presenter, with limited contrition from Cooper, Andy’s meaningless consequences reveal who is truly more valued.
