What's odd is that there are so many pieces on this occasion lionizing Swatantra as a "liberal" party, Shashi Tharoor among them below
A party that defended the rights of the princes, opposed the excesses of land reform, defended religious freedom, was sceptical of social engineering and the bureaucratic state
Hardly based on a defense of materialism that underlies most "classical liberal" arguments in favor of laissez faire economics
But his ideals for the most part gravitated towards the most conservative aspects of Gandhi
Distaste for centralization and bureaucracy
Friendliness towards private enterprise
It was titled "Swatantra Party and Indian conservatism"
So there is no question of calling it a "liberal" party
Labels that even Jan Sangh and today the BJP shy away from
He added in the same piece -
"Since the Congress has swung to the Left, what is wanted is not an ultra or outer-Left, but a strong and articulate Right"
Very unequivocal
Munshi was a prolific writer in Gujarati, and his Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan, for many decades was an influential cultural bulwark
But on the whole the party was anything but "liberal". And definitely not "progressive"
It was anything but that
The leaders of Swatantra weren't as squeamish about the C word as their admirers today