Let us consider Afghanistan,
Let us consider Kashmir,
Let us consider Pakistan’s nuclear weapons, and
Let us return to considering Pakistan.
I wrote none of that on Twitter.
Why did I put it in the newsletter, then? @mclayfield
But that seemed so inefficient: Tweet it, copy the Tweets to a newsletter, reassemble the paragraphs, then Tweet it again?
Why not just ... write it?
It all arises from the same thing. I start thinking about a problem I'm *not* being paid to think about. Turning it over and over in my head.
And meanwhile the work I'm supposed to be doing,
That article, suddenly, becomes deathly dull to me, even though *I am the one who pitched it.*
"What do you say, Bob? 750 words about the Great French Wine Blight, by COB tomorrow?"
It's a self-destructive pathology. I am trying to cure myself of it.
The main point, though, is that yesterday I included a large section that I wrote just for the newsletter, because I didn't want to finish a book review.
But that's not your problem! For you, it's just a bonus. You get an extra-long FREE newsletter full of things you haven't read before. (And this stuff with India and Pakistan really isn't a joke. We're all going to die.)
So get a copy, while you still can, from the original print run.
"Hey! Look what I found in Pop's attic! You don't think it could be an *original* Claire Berlinski, do you?"
"OMG! Yes! ... Whoa! I think it's from her Late Procrastination Years!
"I dunno, man, but it's *gotta* be a lot. I mean ... [hushed, dramatic voice] ... after August 2019, she *never procrastinated again.*
I'll fix that typo at 20:00 UTC/GMT +2 hours.
Hurry, don't walk.

















