Expectedly trash review of Snowden's Permanent Record (penned by crusty-brained elitest Jill Lepore) published in this week's The New Yorker
1/ Lepore is a surveillance apologist that tries to compare the uproar against surveillance—to the reaction against "the 1790 census"🤦♀️
1/ Lepore is a surveillance apologist that tries to compare the uproar against surveillance—to the reaction against "the 1790 census"🤦♀️
2/ And criticizes Snowden for not being qualified as a whistleblower, because he didn't have a Ph.d like Daniel Ellsberg 🙄
3/ Her perspective on Snowden, is pretty much in line with her thinking on the U.S. public in general. To her, social media presents an "unprescented epistemological crisis" (whereas MSM lies, or mass/industrial level surveillance are just a benign blip apparently).
4/ Perhaps Ms.Lepore could go back to Harvard, where she taught for a number of years, and investigate all #Epstein kid-f*cker money her former workplace accepted—instead of calling for the head of someone exposing massive, fascist, illegal, and unconstitutional surveillance.
