In short, it looks very hard, as I argue here after asking around.
1/thread
telegraph.co.uk/politics/2019/…
Throughout #Brexit technical talks have always been a byword for marking time in the hope that something better shows up. See negotiations passim. /2
In a sentence, the UK wants a trade border in Ireland to resolve the #Brexit trilemma. The Irish do not. /3
But that fox now been shot /4
So Downing Street changed up by hinting they might go illegal in that case.
But Lady Hale's ruling snuffed that out too.
The Emperor was already down to his undies. And he lost those y'day. /5
Can Johnson - as Dublin and Brussels and some in UK system hoped he might - pivot towards a more realistic 'landing zone'? Is that still on the cards? /6
Credibility of @BorisJohnson as an interlocutor given prorogation fiasco; credibility of his political position in London to deliver any deal involving a huge climbdown. /7
Can Johnson really go there? And if he did? Would Labour vote for it? /8
Why would Labour bail out @BorisJohnson when they have a chance make him break his 'do or die' pledge?
Downing St talks of 30,40,50 Labour MPs. Mmm...asked one Leave constituency Lab PM last night on that? He said "Less than 10". /9
The decision to rebuff EU overtures (which were made in July) to keep deal space open and go full "abolish the backstop".
The prorogation.
The continued threats a la @SteveBarclay last week in Madrid.
What does that all add up to? /12
And in current world compromise not been much of a 'sell' at the polls. /13
But after all that's happened? After prorogation - with the emphasis, on Labour benches, on the 'rogue'. /16
Benn Act gives everyone an 'out shot'. So the EU talks patiently but without compromising, they wait, watch and then hope a General Election brings some clarity - and a government with credibility to do a deal /17 ENDS