Quite aside from the insult to all that have been subjected to men’s sexual violence, this is how you make data not fit for purpose.
If our policies and practices are evidence based, we need that evidence to be accurate. thetimes.co.uk/article/police…
If our policies and practices are evidence based, we need that evidence to be accurate. thetimes.co.uk/article/police…
What a waste of time and effort, what a massive step backwards if policy and practice around sexual violence increasingly addresses a purported increase in women perpetrators.
What a waste when preventative interventions are tilting at windmills.
What a waste when preventative interventions are tilting at windmills.
Such a clear example of the threat to women’s safety and well-being from trans ideology.
I can’t tell you how long we’ve had to use ‘needs analysis’ and to demonstrate interventions are ‘evidence based’ to justify anything that we try to develop for women survivors of men’s violence. This requirement appears to have been overlooked 4 changes based on trans ideology.
It’s almost as if institution that feminists have long held as institutionally sexist and inherently misogynist (policing,law, politics, education etc) have fallen over themselves at the first opportunity to hit back at women because of their simmering resentment at our critique.
