Twitter Thread Part 1
… because someone’s got to start this conversation
These are the dots I've joined together. Make of it what you will.
#LookingGlass #YellowCube
About 2 ½ hours interview of Bill Wood by Project Camelot's Kerrie Cassidy
1. Project Looking Glass, and
2. The Yellow Cube
Sometimes interchangeably, sometimes as separate projects, but linked.
It's an interdimensional geometrical shape.
In geometry, the tesseract is the four-dimensional analogue of the cube; the tesseract is to the cube as the cube is to the square.
Or from one point in space into another.
Or from one point in time into another.
Watch the movement, and you'll intuitively feel how it might do this.
Sometimes it's referred to as the Yellow Book, leading some to think laterally to include any cubic structure, such as, well, books, but also televisions, computers, etc.
But I say no. A cube is defined as having six square sides.
The Orions gave President Eisenhower a cube about 8cm x 8cm, capable of predicting the future. It was passed between rich and powerful to be able to choose well in their lives.
infinityexplorers.com/the-orion-cube…
... beings called Orions, beings from the star system Z Reticuli ... the agreement made by President Eisenhower, beings called P-50 and the so-called Orions.
I came across this discussion that was the closest (and fastest) answer I could find:
astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/6524…
The response is spread over the next two tweets
To save you scrolling back up, here's the video link
you aware do you know the difference
15:39
between looking glass and the yellow
15:41
cube yes okay and you are you aware of
15:45
what happened to the yellow cube and how
15:47
it was used
15:48
um and so on are you I believe that the
15:52
okay well that coincides with the
16:08
testimony we got can you also verify
16:11
that leaders of but let me say one thing
16:15
about the yellow book neck and it's
16:20
differences
16:22
with looking-glass
16:25
the yellow cube or the yellow book would
16:28
16:33
took basically the choices that you
16:37
would inherently make along a timeline
16:39
and tell you what that timeline would be
16:42
given that you made all the choices that
16:44
your brain would make well this is
16:47
16:48
what we were told is that leaders of
16:50
governments and so on people in high
16:53
places
16:55
you know politically when you would use
16:58
this to try to see their most optimum
17:00
future and then follow those those so
17:02
17:04
wealth etc etc in a very egotistical way
17:08
and that was part of the problem with it
17:11
and that supposedly one of the specific
17:16
things who are told had to do with
17:17
Hillary are you aware of any of that
17:21
... (jumping back to an earlier section)
specifically the 2012 problem with those
04:23
projects the well I guess popular
04:31
opinion of what's out there right now is
04:33
that the project was shut down because
04:39
04:43
I've heard it described a number of
04:48
ways but to my knowledge the problem is
04:54
is the the timelines converge on that
05:00
point in time at the end of 2012
an easy way to put it the choices that
05:50
we make become less and less
05:51
consequential to the future and
05:55
eventually were pushed into this
05:57
bottleneck of time no matter which
06:02
choice we make
06:04
and that's important to the people that
06:08
06:13
would use looking-glass
06:16
knowing the choices that they would make
06:21
and the future would pop up big mistake
06:27
was coming up with the possibility of
06:32
future and when we started using a
06:36
06:39
choice its 79 percent possible that this
06:42
scenario happens and 23 percent are
06:47
possible or whatever you know round
06:50
numbers that this scenario would happen
06:55
the understanding at the time was that
was realistic however if you go down the
07:03
road further and free will continues to
07:07
exercise itself on this game that 79%
07:13
possibility sometimes change is very
07:15
very fast but if you look at the
07:18
situation in a point of time it seems
07:20
07:23
possibility what happened was people
07:29
very smart people began to figure out
07:31
that something big was coming up
07:35
something that made it so all the
07:39
possibilities of all the future
07:41
07:45
that was fed in and observed through the
07:50
looking-glass inherently ended up in the
07:54
same future and no decision and no
07:58
possibility changed past a certain point
that's the big secret okay so is that
08:10
it's well coincides with December 21st 2012
08:16
so at that point all possibilities lead
08:20
to the same timeline it's all possible
08:24
timelines lead to the same basic set of
08:29
history in the future and what is that
history to you did you know that or did
08:35
you find that out that is the big
08:36
question that is the big secret that is
08:40
what sends everybody that has all of the
08:43
information that knows everything into a
08:46
blind panic the people that know
08:51
08:53
gotten all the reports and all the
08:55
information the elites of the world
09:00
probably figured out that that was the
09:06
end of the game
09:08
nothing could be manipulated beyond that
09:12
point
The yellow cube ... would give you your possible future. So it took basically the choices that you would inherently make along a timeline and tell you what that timeline would be, given that you made all the choices that your brain would make.
Two purposes.
1.Plausible deniability when anyone talks about cubes and wormhole travel and visitors from other realms.
2. To get the collective public mind comfortable with such ideas when they are revealed. Finally.
Because they shaped us to be their slaves, and they return to claim us, because we still act like slaves.