Our conclusion: Catholic leaders have not delivered on their promises of full transparency. THREAD
I spoke with nearly 2 dozen survivors, many who took years or decades to come forward about their abuse.
By the time they report, there are often few legal options.
He’s with @CardinalSean, the current leader of the Boston Archdiocese. cardinalseansblog.org/2008/08/29/
In response, the archdiocese barred him from public ministry, entering school/parish property & restricted him from returning to Honduras, where he served for many years.
But it did not add him to its list of accused.
But the archdiocese still didn’t add Donahue.
Still the archdiocese didn’t add him. nbcnews.to/2U1X0a4
But its list has a category specifically for such cases.
Here’s how they responded when asked why he wasn’t on that part of the list:
The archdiocese later conceded that the omission was “an oversight.”
Despite two allegations and one settlement against him, the archdiocese added Donahue to a separate list for “unsubstantiated” cases.
Lists like the one from @ArchOmaha draw their own lines, like not naming seminarians.
Key stats:
- Leaders disclosed the number of reports made against
only 10% of clergy.
- About 58% of clergy listed have information about what
parishes or schools they served in.
Here’s the version from our partner, the @HoustonChron: houstonchronicle.com/news/investiga…
Here’s ours: propublica.org/article/cathol…