Thread by @JackPosobiec

#Macronleaks is legit the biggest story I've ever broken

Dropped the emails of the President of France

Yet the media refuses to refer to me as "the Macronleaks guy"

Why not?

I can explain
everipedia.org/wiki/lang_en/j…

So far only 2 outlets have ever done so

New Yorker:
newyorker.com/news/news-desk…

And The Atlantic
theatlantic.com/politics/archi…

But since 2017, the media seems to have dropped the label. Whenever they write about me, they misleadingly OMIT the biggest story I have ever broken

Why would they do this?

The answer is simple

It's a big problem for them

Leaking a 9GB archive of a politician is a massive story - objectively

Obtaining "protected" information about govt is powerful

And none of them got it

I did

For the same reason none of them gave me credit for my numerous accurate scoops on Mueller, Barr, White House

Naming the whistleblower all the way back in early October

Why?

Their conception of reality is narrow and exists within a thought bubble

For them, I cannot possibly have the ability to uncover information bc I am not an "approved journalist"

Spoiler Alert: I'm a fmr intelligence officer trained in HUMINT. I know how to do this.
Instead, the "guild" of "journalists" seeks to defame and smear me

AT ALL COSTS

Why? Easy.

I represent something that threatens not only their business model, but their entire conception of reality

I can do what they do

Better, Faster, and Cheaper

Than legacy media

And that in itself is power that I have

And they desperately want to stop.

But the dinosaurs

Could not stop the comet.

And unless they change their modes of operation and view of the world, legacy media dinosaurs will be left behind as well by social media personalities who can break better stories AND engage with their audiences

Their world is over

Ours is just beginning