Is #FINCEN coming for #NFT #Art markets? A thread about the #NDAA, Anti-Money Laundering Act of 2020 (AMLA), its expansion of BSA coverage to include “dealers in antiquities,” & what it might mean for the #crypto art world: (link to notice here: fincen.gov/sites/default/… ) /1
Why regulate transactions of antiquities (&maybe art)? The concern is that art & antiquities can be used for money laundering, to violate sanctions, & “have been linked to ...criminal networks, ...terrorism, & the persecution of individuals or groups on cultural grounds.” /2
On Jan. 1, 2021, Congress passed the NDAA, which expands existing anti-money laundering (AML) requirements on a variety of fronts, including the addition of “dealers in antiquities” to the definition of “financial institution.” /3
Specifically, financial institution now includes: “a person engaged in the trade of antiquities, including an advisor, consultant, or any other person who engages as a business in the solicitation or the sale of antiquities.” ... But there are a number of open questions: /4
Who exactly does this cover? We need regulations to tell us what is /is not an “antiquity.” How old must a thing be to become an antiquity? Does it include newer art? We also don’t know whether “Advisor” and “consultant” extends to service providers like lawyers & accountants. /5
We don’t know whether museums that purchase art will be included within the scope of the new law. And we don’t know what “business” means- will those who engage in occasional or sporadic transactions be subject to obligations? /6
This is critical not just to the mainstream art world, but also to the #NFT sector. These #digital assets that confer rights & powers as to audio visual experiences, are generally thought of as a new frontier of digital art. NFTs trade on highly liquid & open marketplaces. /7
If #NFTs are lumped in with “antiquities,” liquid trading markets may find themselves subject to material data retention & reporting obligations. This may restrict trading, slash liquidity, and impose new costs & burdens on intermediaries. /8
What obligations? Implement AML/CFT programs, collect & retain information, file regular reports (i.e. CTRs and SARs), just like other regulated financial intermediaries. it is unclear whether all of the existing obligations imposed on other regulated financial intermediaries /9
will be imposed on antiquities dealers; we will find out sometime this year. The law is not effective until rules and regulations are approved. We can expect those rules/regs sometime this year; the Sect’y of Treasury has 360 days from the enactment of the AMLA to issue rules /10
& the law becomes effective after those rules are approved. Considerable discretion is given to the Sect’y of Treasury in rulemaking; we’ll see if the rules are include things identity collection, and how broadly the law is interpreted and implemented. It's an open question. /11
Section 6110(c) of the AML Act also calls for an “Art Study” which will examine money laundering & terrorism financing through the trade in works of art, which markets should be subject to regulations & the degree to which the regulations should focus on high-value trade /12
in works of art, & on the need to identify the actual purchasers of such works, in addition to other persons engaged in the art trade. The report is due to be presented to Congress in January 2022. /13
Yes this suggests that art & antiquities are thought of as separate (Which may be helpful) but we are not clear exactly how separate or where the dividing line falls. We'll find out when the regs come out. /14
This is not a new and innovative policy being experimented with by the US; this type of regulation already exists in the EU (the EU Fifth Money Laundering Directive) which went into effect last year. /15
This is good for 2 reasons: larger international players are probably already prepared for what’s likely to come their way, and there is or will be data avaialble that can enable parties to study the impact of this regulation on the industry. Worth keeping an eye on. /16
What does this mean for the #NFT and #crypto art world? If you’re a regulated financial institution facilitating transactions in #NFT art, you should be collecting data and reporting. If you’re a new entrant facilitating the sale and purchase of art & antiquities, /17
you should conduct a risk assessment and consider adopting risk -based procedures and policies that call for the collection of data about transactions. If you want a voice in the process, pay close attention to Treasury and to the regs that will issue. /18

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Drew Hinkes

Drew Hinkes Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @propelforward

17 Mar
Yesterday, at the conclusion of my #NYU class discussing #Governance of #Bitcoin and #Cryptocurrencies, I posted this slide, summarizing my thoughts about what the #US can do to improve its #law and #policy related to #Crypto. A #thread on what we can and should fix:
First, establish an government wide-policy. What do we want? Are we pro -innovation? Do want to protecting consumers? Do we want to strike a balance in the middle?Do we want to facilitate experimentation? How much control will the govt take over these experiments? /2
Do we want to make it easier or harder to launch businesses/reach consumers? To make an effective policy, we either need an interagency group, or a new freestanding group focused on the subject. Whoever tackles it, step 1, what do we want? /3
Read 29 tweets
30 Dec 20
OFAC settlement w/@BitGo for apparently failing to prevent users accessing their online hot-wallet service via Crimea, Cuba, Iran, Sudan, & Syria IP addresses; service appears to be a non -custodial online wallet. Violaton of OFAC regs, NOT BSA . Let's look at the regs: /1
31 CFR 515.201, (i.e. Cuban Assets Control Regulations) prohibits transactions by foreign countries and their nationals including "...transfers, withdrawals, or exportations of, any property," /2
31 CFR 560.204 regarding Iran (defined as the Territority of Iran) also prohibits "exportation, reexportation, sale, or supply, ....from the United States....of any goods, technology, or services to Iran or the Government of Iran" /3
Read 11 tweets
26 Sep 20
🚨🚨🚨BREAKING: clarity on how broker dealers should handle non-custodial digital asset securities transactions on ATS. 🚨🚨🚨 THREAD coming atcha /1
/1 since the Joint Staff Statement (July 8, 2019) which addressed BD custody & handling of trades of digital asset securities (sec.gov/news/public-st…) which emphasized consumer protection, it has not been clear how transactions on ATS should be conducted:
/2 The Joint Statement did not make clear how BDs should conduct these trades. Today's letter provides no action relief (i.e. if you do this specific thing, the SEC will not enforce against you) for a specific process flow for digital asset securities transactions by BDs
Read 17 tweets
24 Sep 20
Should #smartcontract code execution always be dispostive? Can code execution actually bind participants if litigation is always available? Does extrinsic goverance of #blockchains that may alter #consensus governance weaken, or strengthen a protocol? Who should care? /1
Short answer- everyone. #Developers #investors & #lawyers all need to understand #blockchain & #smartcontract governance to understand what it means to build on top of others' tech. Can you patent new art built on a blockchain? Will your software work if the underlying chain /2
upgrades its code? What if the underlying blockchain forks? How can a #smartcontract advocate for or against software changes to underlying #blockchain system functionality? Is it worth investing in a project built on a frequently shifting foundation.... /3
Read 4 tweets
12 Aug 20
Another place where #bitcoin tends to show up in litigation is in divorce, when married couples divvy up assets. In DeSouza v. DeSouza, a spouse was held to violate his fiduciary duty to his spouse by concealing #bitcoin. /1 ImageImageImageImage
Here, the divorcing spouse had some #bitcoin tied up in #MtGox and some held on private wallets. One spouse did not disclose the holdings until after the divorce, and the other spouse immediately sought an award of 1/2 and attorney's fees. Court agreed, noting that divorcing /2
Spouses owe statutory fiduciary duties, & failure to disclose the existence of the #bitcoin, payments to Mt. Gox, some bitcoin's ties to #MtGox & the forks of #bitcoincash and #bitcoingold amounted to breaches of duty; Court disagreed that capital appreciation mitigated /3 ImageImageImage
Read 6 tweets
11 Aug 20
#California appellate court affirms summary judgment in favor of @coinbase as to claims for #conversion #breach of contract & negligence; related to #coinbase not supporting #bitcoingold fork for its users; since it's precedent in CA, let's dive in /1 ImageImageImageImage
Court ruled that there was no agreement to give Plaintiff #Bitcoingold; there was no "contractual obligation to support or provide services for any particular cryptocurrency." Merger clause barred parol evidence & there was no contractual duty. That's breach of contract /2
Conversion of crypto is a pet issue of mine because it requires the Court to determine that the thing that is allegedly converted (i.e. the civil version of theft) is legally recognized property. Fun Fact- property rights are mostly created by state law. Only 1 state (Wyoming)/3
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!