Even if opioid settlement money is spent on addiction policy
what addiction policy looks like is extremely subjective
In West Virginia, addiction services mean more in education spending; in Oklahoma, it means more money for corrections. @jimgeraghty@HannahDCox@davidharsanyi
While addiction experts support Harm Reduction policies,
Most politicians look at addiction policy as a corrective, w/ mandatory drug courts & Orwellian surveillance of patients & physicians
After the McKinsey settlement, New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo notified Office of Addiction Services & Supports that of the state's $32 million share, $21 million will be going to the state's general fund
1. Data disruption warrant: gives police the ability to "disrupt data" by modifying, copying, adding, or deleting it.
2. Network activity warrant: allows the police to collect intelligence from devices or networks that are used, or likely to be used, by those subject to warrant
"Under the framework, 60% of Colorado’s settlement proceeds will be distributed to 19 regions of the state. Regional Governance Councils, made up of local leaders from each region, will make decisions about how to spend the money & provide reports"
there is nothing that says this money has to be spent on addiction services, NOTHING
That sweet sweet opioid litigation money is going to general budgets & pet projects,
CDC never had authority to tell the entire federal, state & local governments they couldn't enforce basic property rights law,
crazy-town to believe CDC somehow could make up laws willy-nilly that even congress could never make cuz it would be too crazy & unconstitutional to do