(1/23) This thread is mainly addressed to my #German followers, but it could also be interesting for those who always wanted to know how Germany could become the most culturally leftist country on the European continent. Accordingly, this thread is a #political#commentary by me.
(2/23) It is about the historical personality of the first post-war chancellor, Konrad Adeneauer. I also would like to finally dispel a myth that still plagues German conservatives, by which I do not mean recationaries, but all those who do not want to destroy their own country.
(3/23) This myth is the myth of the "good old", #50s and #60s, #CDU (Christian Democratic Party) and the question of what role a post-war #Germany could have played if #Adenauer and his party had not made completely wrong decisions about essential political directions.
(4/23) Let's start from the beginning: #Adenauer has a great reputation today among many pro-German citizens of the Federal Republic of Germany (FRG). He is considered a true #patriot and father of the country, often also the best #chancellor of the FRG. But that's already wrong.
(5/23) He never had any interest in Germany as a whole. In particular, he could not stand the Lutheran Prussian elites of the German Empires and with them he did not care about large parts of the country. Adenauer's utopia was always a petty-bourgeois, Rhineland-Catholic society.
(6/23) But he did not develop this attitude only after #WW2. He already took a clearly anti-German position after #WW1. #Adenauer was mayor of the city of #Cologne at the time. Cologne, like the #Rhineland, was largely #Catholic, #Germany overwhelmingly #Lutheran Protestant.
(7/23) #Adenauer knew that the spelling of the city name of "Cöln" (eng. Cologne) was important to #Emperor Wilhelm the Second, as it probably reminded him of the #Roman#Empire and the antiquity. For no other reason besides this fact, he changed it to "#Köln" to offend Wilhelm.
(8/23) What was formally a minor matter had a large #symbolic character. Afterwards, #Adenauer even welcomed the #British and #French occupiers. He emphasized that the Rhinelanders were of mixed ancestry and therefore not disparaging towards other peoples, unlike #Germans.
(9/23) Today, by the way, the #Rhineland is the part of the Ferderal Republic of Germany with the smallest percentage of #Germans. A bit ironic, isn't it?
But wait, after WW1 #Adenauer had big plans for his Rhineland!
(10/23) #Adenauer planed to detach the #Rhineland from Germany after #WW1 and administer it as an own state. He envisaged a closer alliance with #Belgium, a prison of nations and a #state that began to erase everything #German within its borders after the World #War.
(10/23) #Adenauer had already shown at that time, that he had no interest in #Germany. But only after the country was devastated in the Second World War, his moment had come.
He was fundamentally anti-communist and #Catholic-#conservative, but at the same time anti-German.
(11/23) #Adenauer was in short:
the perfect administrator of the Western #Allies!
Other men with a #Wehrmacht biography, such as Adenauer had, would have been #neutalized under the premise of "#denazification" and would have received #political bans. Adenauer not.
(12/23) His #centrist party, the #CDU, was deliberately allowed to tap into the conservative spectrum of the #FRG, which was newly founded in 1948. The #occupation authorities kept a close eye on who took up a post in the party.
(12/23) #Adenauer's and the #CDUs agenda was to bind the #FRG to the Western Bloc at any price, and that meant economic, military and cultural submission to #France, Great #Britain and, above all, the #USA.
... in the short term, this may even have been good for the economy:
(13/23) compared to the #GDR, which had to pay reparations to the #USSR, the #FRG profited from the Marshall Plan.
In the long run, however, he has thus denied Germany any #geopolitics of its own and culturally thrown wide open the doors to US universities and their decay.
(14/23) As a result, it was no wonder that some 20 years later, the #protests of 1968 in the #FRG had a greater impact than in any other #European country. #Adenauer's insane West Bloc bonding at any price, had made the country intellectually subservient.
(15/16) But would there have been any other way? What would have happened if he had not subjected Germany to Western hegemony and also not to that of the Eastern bloc? Would it have been possible at all?
The answer, unfortunately, is yes.
(16/23) If the #FRG had withdrawn from #NATO, the #ECSC (predecessor of the #EU) and the #UN, i.e. had kept out of the Western bloc, even the #USSR would have agreed to the reunification of Germany in the early #1950s. Germany could therefore have remained non-aligned.
(17/23) At the same time, this would have meant that many aspects of the development of #US politics would never have taken root in #Germany. The right-wing dominated #universities would have remained, and the #political landscape today would be very different from what it is.
(18/23) I have no false romantic feelings for this country. I myself am aware that there is a lot going wrong behind the #facades. But in many respects, a political society could have been established in #Germany that is not dissimilar to the one that exists currently in #Japan.
(19/23) By this I mean: strict immigration laws, little everyday crime, very conservative social orders and well-developed infrastructure ... the opposite of the country I live in now.
The fact that it could have been so different, remains one of the biggest black pills for me.
(21/23) What Adenauer wanted to make out of the FRG was an enlarged Rhineland, where Catholic petty bourgeois can denounce each other because they cut the hedge 2cm too low and then cuddle up for carnival as if nothing had ever happened.
What he has created in the long run?
(22/23) A country that has been culturally destroyed, politically subservient to foreign masters, where crime is going through the roof, the economy is dying and where Germans will soon be a minority.
History is hard and so must be the verdict on Adenauer ...
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
(0/13)🏴: The following thread solely is a cynical joke for my German Discord Community and contains no serious political, historical or personal views.
If you are not into it, I can understand that. I will delete it after 24h anyways, so dont take this one too serious.
(1/13) 🇩🇪 Wo das aber geklärt ist:
Anfang letzten Monats habe ich meine Discord-Community aufgerufen, mir bis zum ersten April Fragen mit zynischen, extremistischen und degenerierten Inhalten zu stellen, die ich hier beantworten möchte!
Schauen wir mal was dabei rumgekommen ist.
(2/13) I. „Welche osteuropäischen Nationalisten (außer dem Balkan) sind die peinlichsten?“
1. Lechina-Polacken, 2. We-wuz-Dacians-Rumänen und 3. Katjuscha-Russen: in genau dieser Abfolge.
(wobei man sich bei letzteren darüber streiten kann, ob sie ost-„europäisch“ sind)
(1/25) For centuries, Germany was shaped by various small states and elites. However, I would argue that these still live on today in the political mentality of the regions of the FRG.
This, and the question of how much Prussia is in East Germany, is what this thread is about.
(2/25) I would even go so far as to say that they have shaped the FRG over the last 70 years more than most would think, and that understanding these local structures, especially between East and West Germany, is an essential key to securing long-term political power.
(3/25) But let's start from the beginning.
The most obvious political divide is between East and West Germany. Many people tend to attribute this to the GDR alone. I would say that this thesis is wrong at its core. The gap between east and west is much deeper and older.
(1/19) Today a short thread on the Paleo-European languages, possible connections and substrate hypotheses. This is one more about the picture that emerges on the whole. Less about single languages.
(Pictures are mainly from external sources)
(2/19) But let's start from the beginning: what are Paleo-European languages?
They are languages that predate the Indo-European expansion and are therefore "Paleo"-European. Almost all of these languages, with the exception of Basque, are now extinct.
(3/19) The fact that these languages were displaced by Indo-European expansion might make one think that they have been dead for a very long time. While this is true for some, others actually survived for quite a long time. Some even into the early Middle Ages.
(1/17) Today a thread on a very different subject:
This #thread is about one of the theoretically earliest Indo-European peoples in #historiography and what the #Tocharians might have to do with it.
(Pictures are mainly from external sources)
(2/17) There is a #theory that the one of the first Indo-European peoples whose language has been documented in fragments were the #Gutians.
The Gutians were a #nomadic people that appeared in the late 3rd millennium BC on the outskirts of #Mesopotamia.
(3/17) The #Gutians succeed in ruling #Mesopotamia from about 2150 to 2050 BC after the collapse of the #empires there. Their #kings probably ruled hegemonically over the area. However, they were perceived as strangers by the native #Akkadians and #Sumerians.
(1/16) Today again a more theoretical thread about #Germanic#history. It is about a theory of the origin of the first Germanic major #tribes:
the #Iron and #Amber theory!
(Many used images are from external sources, which I will gladly share if needed.)
(2/16) But let's start from the beginning. What is a #Germanic "major #tribe" anyway?
Around the year 0, hundreds of small #tribes lived in #Germania. About 400 years later, however, they were seemingly replaced by a few large tribes, such as the #Goths, #Franks, or #Alemanni.
(3/16) #Researchers therefore asked themselves early on how this development had come about. It was usually assumed that #Germanic#tribes living near the #borders of the #Roman#Empire formed #raiding parties, in order to be able to undertake more successful #raids.
(1/9) Since I have read the last few days some discussions:
I always like to remember that the #Catholic Church has damaged my country for the last 1200 years at a stretch. For me, as a #German, Martin #Luther and Lutheran #Protestantism is a piece of #liberation for my country.
(2/9) Why I don't like the Catholic Church that much in return:
I. Walk to Canossa, destruction of earliest German central state efforts
II. Beheading of Conradin, destruction of German imperial nobility
III. Delegitimization of the Teutonic Knights and their eastern settlement
(3/9)
IV. Trade in indulgences: monetary gain in northern Europe to finance the cultural flowering of Italy
V. Catholic Italianization of the southern German-speaking area, pushing back the German-speaking area from Verona to the Salurn Pass