Duncan Campbell's article in ComputerWeekly about Adam Carter, while purporting to combat disinformation, is rife with inaccuracies, falsehoods and disinformation. He falsely stated that timestamps examined by Forensicator "present only" in London documents. 
2/ This is trivial to rebut. Corresponding timestamps are present in zipfile posted by G2 in October 2016 guccifer2.wordpress.com/2016/10/04/cli… (which I discussed guccifer2.wordpress.com/2016/10/04/cli…). Corresponding timestamps also present in zipfile posted on June 21, 2016 guccifer2.wordpress.com/2016/06/21/hil…
3/ rather than Forensicator advocating, supposedly without evidence, that timestamps proved "theft by local copying", as claimed by Campbell, it was opposite. Forensicator provided a careful exegesis of metadata that is unaffected by Indictment information
theforensicator.wordpress.com/guccifer-2-ngp…
theforensicator.wordpress.com/guccifer-2-ngp…
4/ Forensicator also went to pains to disassociate himself from VIPS speculations, which went well beyond conclusions available from metadata and which were erroneous. He unequivocally stated that "no claim" made that July 5 copying "connected" to DNC.
theforensicator.wordpress.com/2017/08/24/cor…
theforensicator.wordpress.com/2017/08/24/cor…
5/ being familiar with these details, I've repeatedly challenged VIPS leak argument based on July 5 copying speed, as early as Sep 24/17: "intel vets overreached. July 5 copying likely an internal G2 operation. no implication as to original upload speed." twitter.com/search?l=&q=%2…
6/ last year, Campbell asked me questions below by email. He cited Carter's similar challenge whether VIPS conclusions could be deduced from July 5 copying. He also cited Forensicator's agnosticism over meaning of time zone information.
7/ in effect, Campbell and ComputerWeekly have turned the facts upside down. Forensicator analysis, endorsed by Carter, was careful compilation of data and metadata. To my knowledge, its technical points are untouched by new info in Indictment.
