, 43 tweets, 34 min read Read on Twitter
Chelsea’s 2017/18 financial results covered a season when they finished 5th in the Premier League, thus qualifying for the Europa League, and defeated #MUFC to win the FA Cup. Manager Antonio Conte replaced by Maurizio Sarri in July. Some thoughts in the following thread #CFC
#CFC profit before tax increased from £16m to £67m, as revenue rose by £82m (23%) to a record £433m, primarily due to the club’s return to European competition, and profit on player sales was up £44m to £113m. Profit after tax improved from £15m to £62m.
All #CFC revenue streams increased: broadcasting was £42m (26%) higher at £204m, due to Champions League; match day climbed £8m (13%) to £74m, largely for the same reason; while commercial rose £32m (24%) to £165m, mainly from the new Nike kit deal.
On the other hand, there was significant #CFC cost growth: the wage bill increased by £24m (11%) to £244m; player amortisation surged £35m (40%) to £124m; and other expenses rose £10m (10%) to £105m. There were also £6m exceptional cost to buy back retail & merchandising rights.
#CFC £67m profit before tax is not only a record for the club, but is by far the best profit reported to date in the 2017/18 Premier League with next highest being #MUFC £26m and #WHUFC £18m. Two clubs have posted losses: #SCFC £30m and #EFC £13m.
In fact, #CFC £67m profit before tax is actually the third highest ever achieved in the Premier League, only surpassed by #LCFC 2016/17 £92m, boosted by their Champions League adventure, and #THFC 2013/14 £80m, including the major sale of Gareth Bale to Real Madrid,
Of course, #CFC bottom line was massively boosted by £113m profit on player sales, mainly due to the sales of Costa to Atletico Madrid, Matic to Manchester United, Aké and Begovic to Bournemouth. This is the highest in the Premier League to date, ahead of #EFC £88m & #MCFC £39m.
#CFC £113m profit on player sales is actually the highest ever made by an English club, ahead of #THFC 2013/14 £104m and #EFC 2017/18 £88m. In fact, three of the six highest ever profits from this activity have been reported by Chelsea.
#CFC business model is far more reliant on player sales than any other major English club. In the last 5 years, they made a hefty £337m from this activity with only #THFC anywhere near them (£192m in 4 years). For more context, #MCFC and #MUFC only made £108m & £50m respectively.
#CFC have made a profit 3 times in the last 5 seasons (£19m in 2014, £16m in 2017 & £67m in 2018) with significant improvement since the huge £140m loss in 2005. However, 2018/19 is likely to be more challenging, as the club competes in the less lucrative Europa League.
#CFC figures have frequently suffered from so-called exceptional items, which have increased costs by an amazing £208m since 2005, largely early termination of shirt sponsor deals £93m and compensation for sacked managers £69m. 2017/18 does not include Conte’s severance pay.
However, profit from player sales is having an increasing influence on #CFC. Between 2009 and 2013, Chelsea averaged £18m profit, but this has shot up to £67m in the 5 years since then. Excluding player sales, Chelsea’s average annual loss has increased from £67m to £79m.
That said, #CFC EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Tax, Depreciation & Amortisation), considered as a proxy for cash operating profit, as it excludes player sales and exceptional items, has risen 4 years in a row from £16m in 2015 to £94m in 2018, the highest in Chelsea’s history.
Despite this impressive growth, #CFC EBITDA of £94m is still only around half of #MUFC’s £177m, which is due to United’s amazing ability to generate cash, and also below #MCFC £125m.
#CFC have grown revenue by £129m (41%) in the 3 years since 2015, mainly broadcasting £69m and commercial £57m, with match day relatively flat. As chairman Bruce Buck said, “the club has now posted a series of record-breaking revenues.”
Following this growth, #CFC £443m revenue is now the third highest in the Premier League, only behind #MUFC £590m and #MCFC £500m, though the gaps are still substantial. It is possible they will be overtaken by #LFC, when the Reds publish 2017/18 accounts, due to CL money.
#CFC had the 8th highest revenue in the world in 2016/17 according to the Deloitte Money League, though they will almost certainly go above #AFC (no Champions League) and possibly PSG in the next edition.
#CFC £142m Premier League TV money was £9m lower than the previous season, primarily due to a lower merit payment of £31m (5th place vs. 1st) and lower facility fees £30m (broadcast live 26 times vs. 28). Club has received £948m from the Premier League in the last 13 years.
#CFC earned €65m from Europe for reaching the Champions League last 16, similar to the €69m they received in 2015/16. They did not qualify for Europe in 2016/17, so this is pure improvement. It’s the 6th highest distribution in Europe (CL winners Real Madrid got €89m).
Among English clubs, #CFC €65m Champions League revenue was only surpassed by #LFC, who got €81m for reaching the final. Ahead of #MCFC €64m, even though they reached the quarter-final, as Chelsea got higher TV pool, having finished 1st in the Premier League the prior season.
Despite not qualifying for Europe in 2016/17, #CFC have earned an impressive €217m from Europe in the last 5 years, only beaten in England by #MCFC €279m and #AFC €219m. Still ahead of #MUFC €172m, #LFC €153m & #THFC €140m. #CFC only qualified for Europa League in 2018/19.
#CFC commercial revenue rose 24% (£32m) from £133m to £165m, mainly due to the new Nike kit deal (£60m a year, compared to previous Adidas £30m). This is the third highest in England, but still a long way behind the top two: #MUFC £276m and #MCFC £232m.
However, since 2016 #CFC commercial income has increased by 42%, which is the highest to date in the Premier League (#AFC, #LFC and #THFC 2017/18 results to come). The absolute £49m growth is similar to #MCFC £54m and much better than #MUFC £8m.
#CFC have good sponsorship deals: Nike £60m (though this is £900m over 15 years, which might look low later in that period); Yokohama shirt £40m; Carabao training wear £10m; and Hyundai sleeve £6m (though some report £10m).
#CFC match day income rose £8m (13%) from £66m to £74m, as they staged 7 more home games (4 in Europe, 3 in domestic cups. This has taken them (temporarily) to 3rd highest in the top flight, as #LFC likely to be more than £74m in 2017/18. Fair way below #MUFC £110m & #AFC £100m.
Even though Stamford Bridge continued to sell out, the 41,500 average attendance is only the 8th highest in the Premier League (4th highest in London). Ticket prices remained frozen at 2011/12 levels.
This is why Chelsea were looking to upgrade their stadium to a 60,000 capacity, but the £1 bln development has been put on hold, officially “due to the current unfavourable investment climate”, but probably also linked to Roman Abramovich’s difficulties in extending his UK visa.
Having fallen slightly in 2016/17, the wage bill surged £24m (11%) from £220m to £244m, though the wages to turnover ratio improved from 61% to 55%, thanks to the large revenue growth. Admin & commercial staff down 66 (10%). Directors’ remuneration increased from £208k to £916k.
The increase in #CFC wage bill to £244m has narrowed the gap to #MCFC £260m to £16m, but #MUFC continue to power ahead with a wage bill £52m higher than Chelsea at £296m.
Nevertheless, #CFC wages are higher than all other Premier League clubs, notably #LFC £208m, #AFC £199m and #THFC £127m (though these are all 2016/17 figures). #EFC climbed to £145m in 2017/18.
Despite the improvement in the #CFC wages to turnover ratio to 55% (this was as high as 69% in 2015), this is still higher than the major clubs that have already reported in 2017/18: #MUFC 50% and #MCFC 52%.
#CFC player amortisation shot up 40% (£35m) to £124m, reflecting the club’s significant investment in the playing squad. This expense has grown £53m in the last 2 years and is even higher than the £83m reported in 2005, following the initial wave of purchases under Abramovich.
Following this growth, #CFC player amortisation of £124m is now approaching the levels of #MUFC £138m and #MCFC £134m. Big gap to #AFC £77m (2016/17 figure) and #EFC £67m.
Other expenses also increased by 10% (£10m) to £105m in 2017/18 without any real explanation. These costs are now up £34m (48%) in just 2 years. Note: new stadium planning costs have been booked in the holding company, Fordstam Limited.
#CFC made enormous player purchases of £290m, almost as much as the previous 3 seasons combined (£313m). Included Morata, Bakayoko, Drinkwater, Rüdiger, Zappacosta, Emerson, Giroud & Barkley. This was not quite as high as #MCFC £328m, but more than #MUFC £243m and #EFC £215m.
#CFC net spend has substantially ramped up in the last couple of seasons to an annual average of £93m, compared to just £6m for 2014-17. Sales have increased by 12% to £114m, but gross spend has nearly doubled to £208m. 2018/19 includes Kepa, Jorginho and Pulisic.
#CFC have no financial debt in the football club, as this is converted into equity by issuing new shares. That said, the holding company, Fordstam Limited, does have £1.1 bln of debt in the form of an interest-free loan from the owner, theoretically repayable on 18 months notice.
Other clubs have the burden of sizeable debt, most notably #MUFC have £496m even after all the Glazers’ re-financings and #AFC £227m for the “mortgage” on the Emirates stadium, while #EFC and #BHAFC owe £224m and £223m to their owners. #THFC debt will rise due to new stadium.
So #CFC have only paid £1.7m interest (mainly on transfer fee stage payments), while other clubs have had to shell out some tidy sums, e.g. #MUFC £19m, #WHUFC £13m (interest accrued on loans from Sullivan and Gold over past 6 years) and #AFC £12m.
#CFC cash flow from operations was £67m, but the significant £100m (net) player purchases and £7m capex (improvements at Stamford Bridge and the Cobham training ground) required £38m of additional borrowings (net).
Since Abramovich acquired the club, he has put around £1 bln into the club (£69m in 2017/18), split £640m loans and £350m share capital. Most of this funding has been seen on the pitch with a massive £887m (82%) spent on net player recruitment, while £152m went on infrastructure.
#CFC have confirmed that they have complied with UEFA and Premier League financial regulations (i.e. FFP) since 2012. They expect to do so for the foreseeable future, while balancing these imperatives with success on the field.
#CFC chairman Bruce Buck described this as “a successful financial year”, adding “we have a sound business footing to support our on-pitch quest for success.” This is true, but it is worth noting the reliance on profitable player sales and Champions League qualification.
Missing some Tweet in this thread?
You can try to force a refresh.

Like this thread? Get email updates or save it to PDF!

Subscribe to Swiss Ramble
Profile picture

Get real-time email alerts when new unrolls are available from this author!

This content may be removed anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member and get exclusive features!

Premium member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year)

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!