Thread by @Monaheart1229

Devin Nunes, showing what a baby he is by suing Twitter over his parody accounts- a bully GOP Sen who ran for public office, did some sleazy stuff & is unable to take the criticism that comes with making yourself a public fig..& you know, the First Amendment.. #FreedomOfSpeech

https://twitter.com/KFILE/status/1107775300123930624

2- The verbiage in this lawsuit sounds like a conspiracy theory..and it's so odd to me that the Right AND the Left both feel (in reality) that they've been discriminated against by Twitter and the Right wing types like Tomi Lahren & Ann Coulter report people and get them tossed

3-"in twitter jail for criticism all the time..Parts of this lawsuit sound downright paranoid, actually using the word 'conspiracy', "The lawsuit opens by claiming that Twitter is an “information content provider.” It develops content by censoring viewpoints it does not agree

4-"with, hiding such content (including several Nunes tweets) and by “knowingly hosting and monetizing content that is clearly abusive, hateful and defamatory – providing both a voice and financial incentive to the defamers – thereby facilitating defamation on its platform.

5-"”Nunes claims Twitter “ignored lawful complaints” and failed to enforce its terms of service, thus allowing Mair, the accounts and the platform itself to profit from his defamation. It accuses Twitter of allowing the Devin Nunes’ Mom account to impersonate Nunes’ actual mother

6-"who also serves as his campaign treasurer, despite its rules against impersonations within the terms of service.The two accounts and several other similar ones engaged in attacks on Nunes that were “pre-planned, calculated, orchestrated and undertaken by multiple individuals

7-"acting in concert, over a continuous period of time exceeding a year,” the lawsuit says. “The full scope of the conspiracy, including the names of all participants and the level of involvement of donors and members of the Democratic Party, is unknown at this time and

8-"will be the subject of discovery in this action.” The lawsuit also accuses Twitter of influencing elections, including Nunes’ 2018 race for California’s 22nd District. “Twitter is not a neutral platform such as an Internet bulletin board,” the lawsuit says. “To the contrary:

9-"As part and parcel of its Twitter’s (sic) role as an internet content provider, Twitter and its CEO, Jack Dorsey, actively endorse and promote the many agendas of the Democratic Party.” Nunes defeated Janz by about five percentage points — by far the closest race in Nunes’

10-"16-year congressional career. The challenger raised about $10 million and campaigned vigorously for more than 19 months. However, the lawsuit pinned the close margin on Twitter. “Nunes endured an orchestrated defamation campaign of stunning breadth and scope, one that no

11-"human being should ever have to bear and suffer in their whole life,” it reads."
Nunes is REALLY embarrassing himself with this, if it's even possible to humiliate himself more than he did with his pretend House Intel Investigation last yr. fresnobee.com/news/politics-…

12-And what the hell is 'shadow banned'? What does that even mean?