Thread by @TimInHonolulu

1. Barr is lying about Rule 6(e). This is a national security case. Rule 6(e)(3)(D) certainly let's him give it to the Committees.
"(D) An attorney for the government may disclose any grand-jury matter involving foreign intelligence, counterintelligence (as defined in 50 U.S.C

2. §401a3003), or foreign intelligence information (as defined in Rule 6(e)(3)(D)(iii)) to any federal law enforcement, intelligence, . . . or national security official to assist the official receiving the information in the performance of

3. that official's duties. An attorney for the government may also disclose any grand-jury matter involving, within the United States or elsewhere, a threat of attack or other grave hostile acts of a foreign power or its agent, a threat of domestic or international sabotage or

4. terrorism, or clandestine intelligence gathering activities by an intelligence service or network of a foreign power or by its agent, to any appropriate federal . . government official, for the purpose of preventing or

5. responding to such threat or activities."

He's stalling. A full copy should already be in the House and Senate Intel SCIFs. If they drag on a day, I'd apply to the Distinct Court for a Writ of Mandamus. Have it before the DC Cir by Friday.

6. This is a cover up. Barr's a pro. Covered up both #IranContra and #Iraqgate. Here's my report on that forgotten scandal.

https://twitter.com/TimInHonolulu/status/1085215988117716992

.

7. Congress is already behind. File for Mandamus and get in the game. You're not dealing with an amateur. It's Mr. Wolf.
@SpeakerPelosi @RepJerryNadler @RepAdamSchiff @maddow @Lawrence rt