, 3 tweets, 3 min read Read on Twitter
I think about this a lot. Moreso lately. RE: Feb 2018 debate over Nunes release of FISA memo Trey Gowdy brings up Cambridge Analytica as a basis for the Mueller probe. Another reason to wonder if redacted Referral #1 is “Cambridge Analytica”? cbsnews.com/news/transcrip…
I noticed that this narrative about Campaign Strategy on WikiLeaks from Vol I repeats in Vol II except there are additional details especially footnote 30 which refers to Bannon’s FBI interview. Bannon was Cambridge Analytica VP during outreach to WL. thedailybeast.com/trump-data-gur…
However, using Acrobat’s Edit PDF feature I matched the font and Assange fits underneath the redaction while Cambridge Analytica does not. So there’s that. (h/t @DeniseWurl)
Missing some Tweet in this thread?
You can try to force a refresh.

Like this thread? Get email updates or save it to PDF!

Subscribe to David Carroll 🦅
Profile picture

Get real-time email alerts when new unrolls are available from this author!

This content may be removed anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!