,
9 tweets,
3 min read
Read on Twitter
Neutrality..is very on-brand for JC.
The facts of Brexit aren’t neutral & Corbyn’s opponents aren’t playing fair. Being neutral is tantamount to doing nothing. Not only is that politically dangerous, it’s dangerous in a way that real people could get hurt
bylinetimes.com/2019/09/20/cor…
The facts of Brexit aren’t neutral & Corbyn’s opponents aren’t playing fair. Being neutral is tantamount to doing nothing. Not only is that politically dangerous, it’s dangerous in a way that real people could get hurt
bylinetimes.com/2019/09/20/cor…
2/. Really excellent from @RikWorth
Thank you.
“Neutrality”. The appearance that you simply don’t care enough for the Leader of the party to fight the Party’s corner, whatever that is, with fire and conviction is not “neutral”.
It is neglect and looks weak.
Thank you.
“Neutrality”. The appearance that you simply don’t care enough for the Leader of the party to fight the Party’s corner, whatever that is, with fire and conviction is not “neutral”.
It is neglect and looks weak.
3/
“By remaining neutral, Corbyn is going to allow Johnson’s dishonesty to rampage through a second referendum practically unchallenged.”
“By remaining neutral, Corbyn is going to allow Johnson’s dishonesty to rampage through a second referendum practically unchallenged.”
4/
“A balance on the pros and cons of EU membership is one thing, but the potential success of a post-EU Britain against the disastrous effects of Brexit is an entirely different thing”
“A balance on the pros and cons of EU membership is one thing, but the potential success of a post-EU Britain against the disastrous effects of Brexit is an entirely different thing”
5/.
“Johnson’s clear lack of Brexit negotiation and the impact of the details listed in the Operation Yellowhammer papers shouldn’t go unchallenged, nor would any challenge be neutral. How could it? But without a challenge”
“Johnson’s clear lack of Brexit negotiation and the impact of the details listed in the Operation Yellowhammer papers shouldn’t go unchallenged, nor would any challenge be neutral. How could it? But without a challenge”
6/.
“Johnson would be free to bluster and obfuscate to his goal – a goal that his Government admits could lead to food and medicine shortages, a lock on trade and riots.”
“Johnson would be free to bluster and obfuscate to his goal – a goal that his Government admits could lead to food and medicine shortages, a lock on trade and riots.”
7/. “Yes, there are other things that Labour wants to focus on. Yes, we’re all sick of Brexit. But sitting out this last part is a huge risk that is consistent with confusing voters and letting promises and lies be the deciding factor in Brexit rather than the truth”
8/. @BethRigby has got her hands on the conference motion.
The timetable is very worrying and reveals another set of dangers.
The timetable is very worrying and reveals another set of dangers.
9/. All this at a time when Corbyn’s satisfaction rating his the worst recorded for any LOTO since Ipsos Mori started records in 1977, 4% lower than the previous worst, Michael Foot, just before he “led” the Labour Party to an election wipe out
