Thread by @chasrmartin

Okay, so to recap: A whistleblower who didn't actually hear the conversation said Trump made promises to Ukraine, the democrats opened an impeachment press conference saying they were going to think about impeaching Trump, really and truly this time,/1

not like the impeachment inquiry they opened a couple weeks ago, and challenged Trump to release the unredacted transcripts. So Trump did. Then they said it was the whistleblower's complaint that was really significant (although we know said wb hadn't actually heard the call)/2

So Trump announced the wb complaint would be released as well. And now we find out the ICIG questioned the complaint because the wb had a clear political bias, and we find out that said wb is represented by a law firm unethically trolling for clients/3

which just happens to be run by political associates of Chuck Schumer and Hilary Clinton.

Now MSNBC and .@RadioFreeTom are forced to suggest the transcript will be fake./4

@RadioFreeTom BUT now the press has been forced to recognize an old story, ie, that Biden's contacts with foreign governments in Ukraine and China seemed to match up coincidentally with big money jobs for his ne'er-do-well son Hunter, and actual video of Biden explaining how he /5

@RadioFreeTom used a $billion aid package to stop the prosecution of the very same company paying Hunter $600k/p.a.

Leaving Democrats and the press to defend the notion that $billion graft is not corrupt but investigating it is.

I'm going to bed./end

@RadioFreeTom Oh, PS: The democrats were pressuring Ukraine NOT to investigate Biden, by threatening aid.

https://twitter.com/RealSaavedra/status/1176690265676861441?s=20

@threadreaderapp unroll